Comparison of in vivo measured loads in knee, hip and spinal implants during level walking. (25th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Damm, Philipp; Kutzner, Ines; Bergmann, Georg; Rohlmann, Antonius; Schmidt, Hendrik
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomechanics. Volume 51(2017)
• Page Start: 128
• Page End: 132
• Publication Date: 2017-01-25
• Subjects: Walking -- In vivo load measurement -- Hip joint -- Knee joint -- Spinal loads -- Telemetry -- Ground reaction force; Animal mechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Mécanique animale -- Périodiques; Biomécanique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 571.4305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.060
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9290

Abstract

Abstract: Walking is a task that we seek to understand because it is the most relevant human locomotion. Walking causes complex loading patterns and high load magnitudes within the human body. This work summarizes partially published load data collected in earlier in vivo measurement studies on 9 patients with telemeterized knee endoprostheses, 10 with hip endoprostheses and 5 with vertebral body replacements. Moreover, for the 19 endoprosthesis patients, additional simultaneously measured and previously unreported ground reaction forces are presented. The ground reaction force and the implant forces in the knee and hip exhibited a double peak during each step. The maxima of the ground reaction forces ranged from 100% to 126% bodyweight. In comparison, the greatest implant forces in the hip (249% bodyweight) and knee (271% bodyweight) were much greater. The mean peak force measured in the vertebral body replacement was 39% bodyweight and occurred at different time points of the stance phase. We concluded that walking leads to high load magnitudes in the knee and hip, whereas the forces in the vertebral body replacement remained relatively low. This indicates that the first peak force was greater in the hip than in the knee joint while this was reversed for the second peak force. The forces in the spinal implant were considerably lower than in the knee and hip joints.