Confidence in soil carbon predictions undermined by the uncertainties in observations and model parameterisation. (June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luo, Zhongkui; Wang, Enli; Shao, Quanxi; Conyers, Mark K.; Liu, De Li
• Is Part Of: Environmental modelling & software. Volume 80(2016:Jun.)
• Page Start: 26
• Page End: 32
• Publication Date: 2016-06
• Subjects: Carbon cycle -- Carbon sequestration -- Measurement uncertainty -- Model optimisation -- Prediction uncertainty; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; Digital computer simulation -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Computer Simulation -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Écologie -- Simulation, Méthodes de -- Périodiques; Simulation par ordinateur -- Périodiques; Logiciels -- Périodiques; Computer software; Digital computer simulation; Ecology -- Computer simulation; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70015118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-8152

Abstract

Abstract: Soil carbon (C) responds quickly and feedbacks significantly to environmental changes such as climate warming and agricultural management. Soil C modelling is the only reasonable approach available for predicting soil C dynamics under future conditions of environmental changes, and soil C models are usually constrained by the average of observations. However, model constraining is sensitive to the observed data, and the consequence of using observed averages on C predictions has rarely been studied. Using long-term soil organic C datasets from an agricultural field experiment, we constrained a process-based model using the average of observations or by taking into account the variation in observations to predict soil C dynamics. We found that uncertainties in soil C predictions were masked if ignoring the uncertainties in observations (i.e., using the average of observations to constrain model), if uncertainties in model parameterisation were not explicitly quantified. However, if uncertainties in model parameterisation had been considered, further considering uncertainties in observations had negligible effect on uncertainties in SOC predictions. The results suggest that uncertainties induced by model parameterisation are larger than that induced by observations. Precise observations representing the real spatial pattern of SOC at the studied domain, and model structure improvement and constrained space of parameters will benefit reducing uncertainties in soil C predictions. The results also highlight some areas on which future C model development and software implementations should focus to reliably infer soil C dynamics. Highlights: We simulate observed soil carbon dynamics using different calibration strategies. Different model initialisation and/or parameterisation cause divergent predictions. Ignoring uncertainty in observations results in biased predictions. Robust prediction needs accurate observations and constrained parameter space.