Using tree hollow data to define large tree size for use in habitat assessment. Issue 3 (3rd July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Travers, S. K.; Dorrough, J.; Oliver, I.; Somerville, M.; Watson, C. J.; McNellie, M. J.
• Is Part Of: Australian forestry. Volume 81:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 186
• Page End: 195
• Publication Date: 2018-07-03
• Subjects: habitat quality -- tree cavity -- habitat condition -- vegetation condition -- biodiversity metric -- biodiversity indicator -- biodiversity benchmarks; Forests and forestry -- Australia -- Periodicals; Forests and forestry -- Australasia -- Periodicals; 634.90994
• DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2018.1502736
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0004-9158

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Habitat assessments often require observers to estimate tree hollows in situ, which can be costly, destructive and prone to bias. An alternative is to count the number of trees above a specific size. The size at which a tree develops hollows differs substantially among tree species. To assist with setting standards for habitat assessment we defined a large tree as the size at which a species has a 50% probability of supporting a 2-cm diameter hollow. We estimated this size for 68 species using a meta-analysis based on 18 data sources. We found that large tree size ranged from 21 to 106 cm diameter at breast height (DBH). Each species was attributed to vegetation types (formations and classes) to explore variation in large tree sizes. Despite considerable variation within vegetation classes and formations, our results suggest that a large tree size of approximately 50 cm DBH may be appropriate for most vegetation types, with lower estimates in semi-arid vegetation (~30 cm) and higher estimates in wet sclerophyll forests (~80 cm). Our estimates provide empirical support for defining large trees at species vegetation class and formation levels within New South Wales, and highlights the need for more empirical data.