Non-sulfate sulfur in fine aerosols across the United States: Insight for organosulfate prevalence. (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shakya, Kabindra M.; Peltier, Richard E.
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 100(2015)
• Page Start: 159
• Page End: 166
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: We investigated the discrepancies in long-term sulfur measurements from 2000 to 2012 by two separate speciation methods, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy and ion chromatography (IC) across the United States (334 sites). Overall, there was a good correlation between sulfur measurements by XRF spectroscopy and IC ( R ≥ 0.90 for most of the sites). However, the inorganic sulfate measured by ion chromatography was not sufficient to account for all the sulfur measured by XRF spectroscopy at many of the sites. Discrepancies were observed with the high ratios of sulfur measured by XRF spectroscopy to that by IC. Such high ratios also exhibited seasonal variation, and differed across land use types; significant differences occurred at locations classified as forest, agriculture, and mobile, but not in locations classified as commercial, desert, industrial, and residential. On average, the excess, or non-sulfate, sulfur (unmeasured organic sulfur or other inorganic species of sulfur) was variable and observed as high as ∼13% of organic carbon and ∼2% of PM2.5 . The contribution of such assumed organosulfur was larger in the eastern region than other geographical locations in the United States. Besides the temporal and spatial trends, the additional sulfur was found to be related to other factors such as aerosol acidity and emission sources. The results suggest that these unmeasured sulfur species could have significant contribution to aerosol burden, and the understanding of these could help to control PM2.5 levels and to assess other effects of sulfur aerosols. Highlights: Discrepancies in sulfur measurement by IC and XRF were observed. Non-sulfate (organic) sulfur could account for as much as 2% of PM2.5 . The additional sulfur was higher in central and eastern sites than other locations.