Methods and tools used by healthcare professionals to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions in Australia. (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Methods and tools used by healthcare professionals to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions in Australia. (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Methods and tools used by healthcare professionals to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions in Australia
- Authors:
- Peters, Susan E
Johnston, Venerina - Abstract:
- Introduction: Healthcare professionals, including hand therapists, are frequently called upon to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity injuries. However, the methods and tools used to assess barriers to return-to-work remain unknown. Results from these assessments can be used to direct appropriate interventions for those who may be at risk of a prolonged work absence. Methods: The purpose of this study was to identify the tools and methods used by healthcare professionals to assess barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions. A total of 596 Australian healthcare professionals responded to an open-ended question regarding the tools/methods they use to identify barriers to return-to-work. All responses were coded and analysed descriptively. Differences between professional disciplines were recorded. Results: Healthcare professionals nominated 59 types of tools and methods that they use to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions in their clinical practice. The most favoured method was clinical interviewing. Other commonly used tools were clinical measures, e.g., strength, and a return-to-work risk-factor screening tool validated on musculoskeletal diagnoses, the Orebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire. Discussion: Healthcare professionals use a variety of methods and tools to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions. Generally, theyIntroduction: Healthcare professionals, including hand therapists, are frequently called upon to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity injuries. However, the methods and tools used to assess barriers to return-to-work remain unknown. Results from these assessments can be used to direct appropriate interventions for those who may be at risk of a prolonged work absence. Methods: The purpose of this study was to identify the tools and methods used by healthcare professionals to assess barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions. A total of 596 Australian healthcare professionals responded to an open-ended question regarding the tools/methods they use to identify barriers to return-to-work. All responses were coded and analysed descriptively. Differences between professional disciplines were recorded. Results: Healthcare professionals nominated 59 types of tools and methods that they use to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions in their clinical practice. The most favoured method was clinical interviewing. Other commonly used tools were clinical measures, e.g., strength, and a return-to-work risk-factor screening tool validated on musculoskeletal diagnoses, the Orebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire. Discussion: Healthcare professionals use a variety of methods and tools to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions. Generally, they favoured subjective methods. Future research is needed to develop or validate assessment tools designed to identify barriers to return-to-work for workers with upper extremity conditions. In the absence of upper extremity specific screening tools, hand therapists should consider the biopsychosocial framework when evaluating barriers to return-to-work. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Hand therapy. Volume 22:Number 1(2017)
- Journal:
- Hand therapy
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Number 1(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0022-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 26
- Page End:
- 34
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- Assessment -- work disability -- occupational health -- workers' compensation -- risk factors
Hand -- Wounds and injuries -- Treatment -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Hand -- Wounds and injuries -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
617.57506 - Journal URLs:
- http://hth.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1758998316665058 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1758-9983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7502.xml