Are all risk perceptions created equal? Comparing general risk assessments and specific risk assessments associated with climate change. Issue 1 (2nd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stoutenborough, James W.; Vedlitz, Arnold; Xing, Xin
• Is Part Of: Human & ecological risk assessment. Volume 22:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 50
• Page End: 70
• Publication Date: 2016-01-02
• Subjects: public risk assessment -- risk perceptions -- climate change -- policy-making; Health risk assessment -- Periodicals; Ecological risk assessment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Risk Assessment -- Periodicals; 363.102
• DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1054924
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1080-7039

Abstract

ABSTRACT: For policy-making to address public risk perceptions effectively, policy-makers must have a clear understanding of the nature of public risks. Public opinion polls regularly solicit perceptions of risk toward a variety of topics. These assessments, though, tend to be general with no specificity offered for a nuanced interpretation. Yet, there is good reason to assume that risk perceptions are not based on the same criteria. If true, policy-makers may be unable to address risks adequately without a better understanding of the drivers of risk perceptions. This project focuses on two primary research questions: (1) Does the public weigh the risk associated with global climate change differently in specific sub-domains? (2) If so, which climate change sub-domains are various members of the public most concerned about when offering a general assessment of global climate change risk? We assess public risk perceptions of climate change in three sub-domains—public health, economic development, and environment—and find that two of the three sub-domains are predictors of a general assessment of risk.