Increased water intake to reduce headache: learning from a critical appraisal. Issue 6 (21st July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Increased water intake to reduce headache: learning from a critical appraisal. Issue 6 (21st July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Increased water intake to reduce headache: learning from a critical appraisal
- Authors:
- Price, Amy
Burls, Amanda - Abstract:
- Abstract Critically Appraised Topic (CAT): Water Intake to Reduce Headache: Clinical Bottom Line: Water intake is a cost effective, non‐invasive and low‐risk intervention to reduce or prevent headache pain. Rationale: Chronic mild dehydration may trigger headache. Increased water intake could help. A small trial shows modest benefit; however, a larger methodologically sound randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm efficacy. Critically Appraised Paper: Spigt, M., Weerkamp, N., Troost, J., van Schayck, C. P., & Knottnerus, J. A. (2012). 'A randomized trial on the effects of regular water intake in patients with recurrent headaches.' Family practice, 29 (4), 370–5. Doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr112 Clinical scenario: Patients from primary care registered as 'headache', 'tension headache' and/or 'migraine' for more than one year who suffer at least two episodes of moderately intense headache or more than four mildly intense episodes of headache per month with a daily fluid intake of less than 2.5 litres per day. PICO (M): P atient/Problem = Headache > 1 year with 2 moderately intense or 4 mildly intense episodes per month I ntervention = 1.5 litres water per day + stress control and sleep hygiene C omparison/Control = stress control and sleep hygiene O utcome = Reduce or eliminate headache M ethodology = Therapy RCT Table 1 : Final Search Terms TRIP Data Base: hits = 517 used filter Extended Primary research 4 found 1 paper applicable 'Water intake '[MeSH Terms] AND 'HeadacheAbstract Critically Appraised Topic (CAT): Water Intake to Reduce Headache: Clinical Bottom Line: Water intake is a cost effective, non‐invasive and low‐risk intervention to reduce or prevent headache pain. Rationale: Chronic mild dehydration may trigger headache. Increased water intake could help. A small trial shows modest benefit; however, a larger methodologically sound randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm efficacy. Critically Appraised Paper: Spigt, M., Weerkamp, N., Troost, J., van Schayck, C. P., & Knottnerus, J. A. (2012). 'A randomized trial on the effects of regular water intake in patients with recurrent headaches.' Family practice, 29 (4), 370–5. Doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr112 Clinical scenario: Patients from primary care registered as 'headache', 'tension headache' and/or 'migraine' for more than one year who suffer at least two episodes of moderately intense headache or more than four mildly intense episodes of headache per month with a daily fluid intake of less than 2.5 litres per day. PICO (M): P atient/Problem = Headache > 1 year with 2 moderately intense or 4 mildly intense episodes per month I ntervention = 1.5 litres water per day + stress control and sleep hygiene C omparison/Control = stress control and sleep hygiene O utcome = Reduce or eliminate headache M ethodology = Therapy RCT Table 1 : Final Search Terms TRIP Data Base: hits = 517 used filter Extended Primary research 4 found 1 paper applicable 'Water intake '[MeSH Terms] AND 'Headache '[All Fields]' Best match to PICO, (2012) RCT Selection Criterion and Overall Results: 102 headache patients in16 primary care clinics were randomized into control (n = 50) and intervention groups (n = 52) Inclusion criteria = two > episodes of moderately intense headache or five > mildly intense headaches per month and total fluid intake > 2.5 litres per day, Follow‐up @ 3 months. 79% intervention and 66% of controls completed RCT. Drinking more water resulted in a statistically significant improvement of 4.5 (confidence interval: 1.3–7.8) points on Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life (MSQOL). 47% in the intervention (water) group self‐reported improvement (6 > on a 10‐point scale) against 25% in controls. Drinking water did not reduce headache days. Comments: The transparency from the author of this critically appraised paper enables others to use this study as a teaching tool and to learn from the shortcomings in the trial. The study was underpowered and contains methodological shortcomings. Participants were partially un‐blinded during the trial increasing the risk for bias. Only the subjective measures are statistically significant and attrition was significant. The intervention is low risk and of negligible cost. A methodologically sound RCT is recommended to evaluate if the intervention has beneficial effects. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. Volume 21:Issue 6(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 6(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0021-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1212
- Page End:
- 1218
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-21
- Subjects:
- evidence‐based medicine -- person‐centred medicine -- public health -- headache -- public led online trials -- critical appraisal training
Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
616.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2753 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jep.12413 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1356-1294
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.640800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7313.xml