A longitudinal examination of leisure time physical activity following amputation in England. (July 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A longitudinal examination of leisure time physical activity following amputation in England. (July 2018)
- Main Title:
- A longitudinal examination of leisure time physical activity following amputation in England
- Authors:
- Wadey, Ross
Day, Melissa - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: There is a significant body of research on leisure time physical activity (LTPA) among people with physical disabilities. Yet, while this data set has been informative in identifying the social-relational factors that affect LTPA across disability groups, there is now a demand for context- and population-specific studies to provide a more nuanced understanding to better inform decision-makers and service-providers. This original study is the first to examine the barriers, facilitators, and benefits of LTPA among people with an amputation in England. Methods: Multi-method, longitudinal research design (from April 2014 to May 2016). Participants were recruited using maximum-variation and criterion-based purposeful sampling. Data collection included two focus groups (>4hrs), fieldwork observations (>225hrs), and 44 formal interviews (>50hrs). Practical strategies used to support or evidence the study's quality in terms of its credibility, rigour, generalizability, and significance included author self-reflexivity, member reflections from participants, and external reflections with key stakeholders before seeking publication. This large qualitative dataset was rigorously analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Ten themes were identified: personal wellbeing, social wellbeing, physical wellbeing, inspiration, self-presentation, experience of LTPA, knowledge of LTPA, environment, organisational functioning, and miscellaneous. Conclusions: ThisAbstract: Objectives: There is a significant body of research on leisure time physical activity (LTPA) among people with physical disabilities. Yet, while this data set has been informative in identifying the social-relational factors that affect LTPA across disability groups, there is now a demand for context- and population-specific studies to provide a more nuanced understanding to better inform decision-makers and service-providers. This original study is the first to examine the barriers, facilitators, and benefits of LTPA among people with an amputation in England. Methods: Multi-method, longitudinal research design (from April 2014 to May 2016). Participants were recruited using maximum-variation and criterion-based purposeful sampling. Data collection included two focus groups (>4hrs), fieldwork observations (>225hrs), and 44 formal interviews (>50hrs). Practical strategies used to support or evidence the study's quality in terms of its credibility, rigour, generalizability, and significance included author self-reflexivity, member reflections from participants, and external reflections with key stakeholders before seeking publication. This large qualitative dataset was rigorously analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Ten themes were identified: personal wellbeing, social wellbeing, physical wellbeing, inspiration, self-presentation, experience of LTPA, knowledge of LTPA, environment, organisational functioning, and miscellaneous. Conclusions: This article makes a novel and significant contribution to research by revealing the dynamic and relational nature of barriers, facilitators, and benefits. Practical implications for LTPA policies and practices are considered through a social ecological lens (i.e., intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy). Highlights: An original and rigorous examination of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) among people with an amputation in England. Factors implacting LTPA in England are dynamic, fluid, and relational. Findings provide a rigorous foundation for a 'bottom up' approach for LTPA promotion (NHS England, 2014). Practical implications are considered at an intrapersonal, interpersonal, insitutional, community, and policy level. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychology of sport and exercise. Volume 37(2018)
- Journal:
- Psychology of sport and exercise
- Issue:
- Volume 37(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0037-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 251
- Page End:
- 261
- Publication Date:
- 2018-07
- Subjects:
- Qualitative -- Generalizability -- Rigour -- Policy -- Sport -- Exercise
Sports -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals
Exercise -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals
Psychology -- Periodicals
Sports -- Periodicals
Exercise -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
Psychology
Sports
Exercise
Societies, Medical
Sports -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques
Exercice -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques
613.71019 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14690292 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.11.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1469-0292
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.536590
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7268.xml