MRI to investigate iliac artery wall thickness in triathletes. Issue 3 (3rd July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Regus, Susanne; Almási-Sperling, Veronika; Janka, Rolf; Rother, Ulrich; Lell, Michael; Meyer, Alexander; Lang, Werner
• Is Part Of: Physician and sportsmedicine. Volume 46:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 393
• Page End: 398
• Publication Date: 2018-07-03
• Subjects: Endofibrosis -- triathletes -- leg pain -- endurance athletes; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine du sport -- Périodiques; Sports medicine; Sportgeneeskunde; Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1450060
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0091-3847

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objectives : Endofibrosis was first described in endurance athletes. This rare disease is characterized by intimal hyperplasia of iliac arteries. Due to non-specific symptoms diagnosing could be very challenging and delayed. This represents a serious problem not only for affected athletes but also for consulting physicians. The aim of this study was to analyze intimal thickness of iliac arteries using non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in competitive triathletes suffering from exercise induced leg pain consistent with symptoms caused by endofibrosis. Methods : 18 highly trained triathletes (16 triathletes, 12 male) with a mean age of 45.4 ± 10.2 years were investigated by non-contrast MRI. We divided subjects into two groups: 10 complaint about exercise- induced leg pain and 7 were free of any symptoms. In all 10 symptomatic athletes consulting physicians excluded musculoskeletal or neurological disorders before and we suspected endofibrosis. One patient was excluded from statistical analysis due to a known recurrent external iliac artery (EIA) occlusion after surgical repair 6 month ago. Results : Mean wall thickness (T) of all 17 subjects was 1.34 ± 0.11mm for the common iliac artery (CIA) and 1.74 ± 0.18mm for the EIA. We found no significant differences by comparing T of symptomatic (s) and asymptomatic (a) legs. There were no significant differences in mean ratio of patent artery to whole artery between the symptomatic and asymptomatic legs for the CIA (0.81 vs 0.82, p = 0.87) and for the EIA (0.71 vs 0.72, p = 0.78). MRI shows a thickening of the left EIA (4.41mm) in the patient who suffered from recurrent occlusion of the left EIA and after surgical repair and histological examination confirmed an endofibrotic lesion. Conclusion : Non-contrast MRI seems to be an appropriate diagnostic tool to exclude endofibrosis in triathletes, but it cannot be recommended as initial screening modality for athletes suffering from exercise-induced leg pain.