Flame retardants and organochlorines in indoor dust from several e-waste recycling sites in South China: Composition variations and implications for human exposure. (May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zheng, Xiaobo; Xu, Fuchao; Chen, Kehui; Zeng, Yanhong; Luo, Xiaojun; Chen, Shejun; Mai, Bixian; Covaci, Adrian
• Is Part Of: Environment international. Volume 78(2015:May)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 7
• Publication Date: 2015-05
• Subjects: Electronic-waste recycling -- Flame retardants -- Human exposure -- Indoor dust; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Protection -- Périodiques; Hygiène du milieu -- Périodiques; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Périodiques; Environmental health; Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Periodicals; 333.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-4120

Abstract

Abstract: Several classes of flame retardants, such as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs), dechlorane plus (DPs), and organophosphate flame retardants (PFRs), together with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were measured in indoor dust from five villages located in three e-waste recycling regions in Guangdong Province, South China. The medians of PBDEs, NBFRs, and PFRs in dust in five sites ranged from 685–67, 500, 1460–50, 010, and 2180–29, 000 ng/g, respectively. These concentrations were much higher than the medians of PCBs (52–2900 ng/g). BDE 209 and decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE) were the two major halogen flame retardants in dust, while tris-(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP) and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) were the major PFRs. Principle component analysis revealed the different pollutant patterns among different sites. The estimated median human exposures of PBDEs, NBFRs, PFRs, and PCBs via dust ingestion were 1.1–24.1, 0.73–20.3, 1.36–23.5, and 0.04–0.93 ng/kg bw/day for adults, and 16.2–352, 10.7–296, 19.9–343, 0.05–0.61, 0.65–13.6 ng/kg bw/day for toddlers, respectively. Residents from Site 5 had the highest exposure (95 percentile levels and high dust ingestion for toddlers) of PBDEs (3920 ng/kg bw/day), NBFRs (3200 ng/kg bw/day), and PFRs (5280 ng/kg bw/day). More attention should be paid to the contamination with NBFRs and PFRs, instead of PCBs, in these e-waste recycling regions, and local public health threat from PBDE alternatives should remain of concern. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on human exposure assessment of PFRs at e-waste sites. Highlights: PBDEs, NBFRs, DPs, PFRs, and PCBs were studied in indoor dust from e-waste sites. BDE 209, DBDPE, and TCIPP were the major contributors of PBDEs, NBFRs, and PFRs. These contaminants have different sources in various e-waste sites. Human exposure to contaminants was at the high-end of previous reports. PFR occurrence and human exposure were studied for the first time in e-waste sites.