Transumbilical Thoracoscopy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopy for Lung Wedge Resection: Safety and Efficacy in a Live Canine Model. (December 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Transumbilical Thoracoscopy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopy for Lung Wedge Resection: Safety and Efficacy in a Live Canine Model. (December 2015)
- Main Title:
- Transumbilical Thoracoscopy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopy for Lung Wedge Resection
- Authors:
- Chen, Tzu-Ping
Yen-Chu,
Wu, Yi-Cheng
Yeh, Chi-Ju
Liu, Chien-Ying
Hsieh, Ming-Ju
Yuan, Hsu-Chia
Ko, Po-Jen
Liu, Yun-Hen - Abstract:
- Purpose . Transumbilical single-port surgery has been associated with less postoperative pain and offers better cosmetic outcomes than conventional 3-port laparoscopic surgery. This study compares the safety and efficacy of transumbilical thoracoscopy and conventional thoracoscopy for lung wedge resection. Methods . The animals (n = 16) were randomly assigned to the transumbilical thoracoscopic approach group (n = 8) or conventional thoracoscopic approach group (n = 8). Transumbilical lung resection was performed via an umbilical incision and a diaphragmatic incision. In the conventional thoracoscopic group, lung resection was completed through a thoracic incision. For both procedures, we compared the surgical outcomes, for example, operating time and operative complications; physiologic parameters, for example, respiratory rate and body temperature; inflammatory parameters, for example, white blood cell count; and pulmonary parameters, for example, arterial blood gas levels. The animals were euthanized 2 weeks after the surgery for gross and histologic evaluations. Results . The lung wedge resection was successfully performed in all animals. There was no significant difference in the mean operating times or complications between the transumbilical and the conventional thoracoscopic approach groups. With regard to the physiologic impact of the surgeries, the transumbilical approach was associated with significant elevations in body temperature on postoperative day 1, whenPurpose . Transumbilical single-port surgery has been associated with less postoperative pain and offers better cosmetic outcomes than conventional 3-port laparoscopic surgery. This study compares the safety and efficacy of transumbilical thoracoscopy and conventional thoracoscopy for lung wedge resection. Methods . The animals (n = 16) were randomly assigned to the transumbilical thoracoscopic approach group (n = 8) or conventional thoracoscopic approach group (n = 8). Transumbilical lung resection was performed via an umbilical incision and a diaphragmatic incision. In the conventional thoracoscopic group, lung resection was completed through a thoracic incision. For both procedures, we compared the surgical outcomes, for example, operating time and operative complications; physiologic parameters, for example, respiratory rate and body temperature; inflammatory parameters, for example, white blood cell count; and pulmonary parameters, for example, arterial blood gas levels. The animals were euthanized 2 weeks after the surgery for gross and histologic evaluations. Results . The lung wedge resection was successfully performed in all animals. There was no significant difference in the mean operating times or complications between the transumbilical and the conventional thoracoscopic approach groups. With regard to the physiologic impact of the surgeries, the transumbilical approach was associated with significant elevations in body temperature on postoperative day 1, when compared with the standard thoracoscopic approach. Conclusions . This study suggests that both approaches for performing lung wedge resection were comparable in efficacy and postoperative complications. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical innovation. Volume 22:Number 6(2015:Dec.)
- Journal:
- Surgical innovation
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Number 6(2015:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0022-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 568
- Page End:
- 576
- Publication Date:
- 2015-12
- Subjects:
- NOTES -- SILS -- single-site surgery -- evidence-based medicine/surgery
Surgery, Operative -- Periodicals
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive -- Periodicals
Diffusion of Innovation -- Periodicals
Chirurgie opératoire -- Périodiques
Chirurgie endoscopique -- Périodiques
Chirurgie laparoscopique -- Périodiques
617.91 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/sri ↗
http://sri.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201793 ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1553350614552733 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1553-3506
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7229.xml