THE SHADOW OF THE COURT: THE GROWING IMPERATIVE TO REFORM ETHICAL REGULATION OF FORMER JUDGES. Issue 3 (28th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Appleby, Gabrielle; Blackham, Alysia
• Is Part Of: International and comparative law quarterly. Volume 67:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 505
• Page End: 546
• Publication Date: 2018-05-28
• Subjects: comparative law, -- former judges, -- judges, -- judicial accountability, -- judicial ethics, -- judicial independence, -- judicial regulation, -- judicial retirements; International law -- Periodicals; Comparative law -- Periodicals; 340.2
• DOI: 10.1017/S0020589318000143
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-5893

Abstract

Abstract: In recent years there has been a trend towards independent and more transparent ethical regulation for sitting judges, which is said to promote public confidence in the judicial institution, and reflect a move towards accountability and transparency as judicial values. However, regimes governing sitting judges largely fall away when the judge retires from the bench. Increasing longevity and rising numbers of former judges raise complex ethical regulation questions. Drawing on judicial ethics regimes in England and Wales, Australia, the United States and New Zealand, and instances where the conduct of former judges has reflected poorly on the integrity of the judiciary, this article argues that there are strong reasons for extending ethics regulation beyond judicial retirement. By reference to the principles that inform the rules regulating the conduct of sitting judges, we investigate the extent to which misconduct and disciplining regimes should extend to former judges, and whether there is a stronger role for soft instruments and more formalized processes for regulating former judges. In doing so, we propose a model for the development of ethical regulation for former judges.