PP.06.08: VALIDATION OF A NEW PIEZO-ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY. (June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PP.06.08: VALIDATION OF A NEW PIEZO-ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR NON-INVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY. (June 2015)
- Main Title:
- PP.06.08
- Authors:
- Morales, M.
Cuffaro, P.
Barochiner, J.
Rada, M.
Alfie, J.
Aparicio, L.
Marin, M.
Galarza, C.
Waisman, G. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: our aim was to validate a new device for pulse velocity(PWC) measurement-Aortic- according to the recommendations of the Artery Society and using SphygmoCor as the comparator device.. Design and method: 85 subjects 18–80 years-old from both sexes were included, divided into 3 age groups: < 30, 30–60 and > 60 years (minimun of 25 individuals per group) and with an equal number of hypertensive and normotensive subjects per group. Weight, height, blood pressure (BP) and PWV were assesed, performing 6 PWV determinants per subject: 3 with Aortic and 3 with SphygmoCor, in an alternative fashion. The Bland-Altman method was used to establish the level of agreement between the two devices.. Results: PWV was 6.96 (±1.84) and 7 (±1.54) m/s with Aortic and SphygmoCor, respectively, showing a high correlation: r = 0.89, p < 0.001. The coefficient of repeatability was 16.87 for Aortic and 4.22 for SphygmoCor. Applying the Bland-Altman method, the mean difference between devices was 0.02 (±0.84) m/s, which is considered an excellent level of agreement. Of the study population, 75.3% (n = 64), 15.3% (n = 13) and 9.4% (n = 8) reached an excellent (mean difference < = 0.5 ± 0.8 m/s), acceptable (mean difference < = 1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) and poor (mean difference > = 1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) level of agreement, respectively. Conclusions: Aortic showed an excellent level of agreement with SphygmoCor, the reference method, according to the Artery Society recommendations for PWVAbstract : Objective: our aim was to validate a new device for pulse velocity(PWC) measurement-Aortic- according to the recommendations of the Artery Society and using SphygmoCor as the comparator device.. Design and method: 85 subjects 18–80 years-old from both sexes were included, divided into 3 age groups: < 30, 30–60 and > 60 years (minimun of 25 individuals per group) and with an equal number of hypertensive and normotensive subjects per group. Weight, height, blood pressure (BP) and PWV were assesed, performing 6 PWV determinants per subject: 3 with Aortic and 3 with SphygmoCor, in an alternative fashion. The Bland-Altman method was used to establish the level of agreement between the two devices.. Results: PWV was 6.96 (±1.84) and 7 (±1.54) m/s with Aortic and SphygmoCor, respectively, showing a high correlation: r = 0.89, p < 0.001. The coefficient of repeatability was 16.87 for Aortic and 4.22 for SphygmoCor. Applying the Bland-Altman method, the mean difference between devices was 0.02 (±0.84) m/s, which is considered an excellent level of agreement. Of the study population, 75.3% (n = 64), 15.3% (n = 13) and 9.4% (n = 8) reached an excellent (mean difference < = 0.5 ± 0.8 m/s), acceptable (mean difference < = 1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) and poor (mean difference > = 1.0 ± 1.5 m/s) level of agreement, respectively. Conclusions: Aortic showed an excellent level of agreement with SphygmoCor, the reference method, according to the Artery Society recommendations for PWV measurement. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hypertension. Volume 33(2015)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Journal of hypertension
- Issue:
- Volume 33(2015)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0033-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06
- Subjects:
- Hypertension -- Periodicals
Hypertension -- Periodicals
616.132005 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com/jhypertension/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00004872-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.jhypertension.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.hjh.0000467882.33685.59 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1473-5598
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5004.510000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7206.xml