8B.07: RESULTS FROM THE UK RENAL DENERVATION AFFILIATION- 246 CASES FROM 17 CENTRES. (June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 8B.07: RESULTS FROM THE UK RENAL DENERVATION AFFILIATION- 246 CASES FROM 17 CENTRES. (June 2015)
- Main Title:
- 8B.07
- Authors:
- Sharp, A.
Hameed, A.
Nightingale, A.
Martin, U.
Mark, P.
Mckane, W.
Cunnington, M.
Lobo, M.
Mahadevan, K.
Richardson, T.
Gerber, R.
Clifford, P.
Burchell, A.
Doulton, T.
Dimario, C.
Thackray, S.
Redwood, S.
Davies, J.
Antonios, T.
Dasgupta, I. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To describe the UK experience with Renal Denervation (RDN). Design and method: RDN may lower blood pressure (BP) in people with resistant hypertension. The UK Renal Denervation Affiliation is an independent, investigator-led initiative. Each centre had done >5 cases. A standardised dataset was collected retrospectively, anonymised and submitted to the coordinating centre for analysis. Results: Results from 246 cases from 16 centres are reported. Average cases per centre was 15. Five different ablation technologies were used: unipolar catheters in 198 and multipolar in 48. Mean age was 56.7 years, 53% female, 87% Caucasian and 27% diabetes. Previous stroke/TIA - 24%; myocardial infarction - 15%; proteinuria - 26%. Patients were screened by a mean of 1.6 specialists with an interest in hypertension. 86% attended specialist hypertension clinics. On average 4.7 drugs were used before RDN; 95% were on 3+ drugs; 90% were on RAS blockers, 90% diuretics and 56% aldosterone antagonists at time of RDN. Pre-RDN mean office BP was 186/102 mmHg. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABP) data were available for 179 patients (73%). Average pre-RDN ABP was: daytime - 170/98; night - 154/86. Average follow-up was 10.7 months. Mean Office BP post-RDN was 164/93, a fall of 22/9 mmHg (P < 0.001). In 24%, office SBP fell 40+ mmHg. On average, 0.8 drugs were withdrawn per patient and 0.3 drugs added between RDN and follow-up. Mean daytime ABP after RDN was 158/92 andAbstract : Objective: To describe the UK experience with Renal Denervation (RDN). Design and method: RDN may lower blood pressure (BP) in people with resistant hypertension. The UK Renal Denervation Affiliation is an independent, investigator-led initiative. Each centre had done >5 cases. A standardised dataset was collected retrospectively, anonymised and submitted to the coordinating centre for analysis. Results: Results from 246 cases from 16 centres are reported. Average cases per centre was 15. Five different ablation technologies were used: unipolar catheters in 198 and multipolar in 48. Mean age was 56.7 years, 53% female, 87% Caucasian and 27% diabetes. Previous stroke/TIA - 24%; myocardial infarction - 15%; proteinuria - 26%. Patients were screened by a mean of 1.6 specialists with an interest in hypertension. 86% attended specialist hypertension clinics. On average 4.7 drugs were used before RDN; 95% were on 3+ drugs; 90% were on RAS blockers, 90% diuretics and 56% aldosterone antagonists at time of RDN. Pre-RDN mean office BP was 186/102 mmHg. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABP) data were available for 179 patients (73%). Average pre-RDN ABP was: daytime - 170/98; night - 154/86. Average follow-up was 10.7 months. Mean Office BP post-RDN was 164/93, a fall of 22/9 mmHg (P < 0.001). In 24%, office SBP fell 40+ mmHg. On average, 0.8 drugs were withdrawn per patient and 0.3 drugs added between RDN and follow-up. Mean daytime ABP after RDN was 158/92 and nighttime ABP 145/81 - fall in daytime ABP was 12/6 (p < 0.001). 18% had a drop in day systolic ABP of >20 mmHg. A decrease in GFR >25% was seen at 10 months in 5% patients. Otherwise, no significant complications were seen. Conclusions: In a cohort of 246 patients from 16 UK centres who had undergone renal denervation, a significant fall in blood pressure was observed. Office BP fell by 22/9 mmHg. Daytime ambulatory BP fell by 12/6 mmHg. Carefully selected patients with resistant hypertension exhibited significant BP reduction following RDN. This was a group with severe hypertension who had been well characterised in specialist hypertension clinics. Drug additions/withdrawals did not appear to explain the BP fall. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hypertension. Volume 33(2015)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Journal of hypertension
- Issue:
- Volume 33(2015)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0033-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06
- Subjects:
- Hypertension -- Periodicals
Hypertension -- Periodicals
616.132005 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com/jhypertension/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00004872-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.jhypertension.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.hjh.0000467643.85364.79 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1473-5598
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5004.510000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7211.xml