Impact of bystander-performed ventilation on functional outcomes after cardiac arrest and factors associated with ventilation-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A large observational study. (June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of bystander-performed ventilation on functional outcomes after cardiac arrest and factors associated with ventilation-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A large observational study. (June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Impact of bystander-performed ventilation on functional outcomes after cardiac arrest and factors associated with ventilation-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A large observational study
- Authors:
- Maeda, Tetsuo
Kamikura, Takahisa
Tanaka, Yoshio
Yamashita, Akira
Kubo, Minoru
Takei, Yutaka
Inaba, Hideo - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: To determine the effectiveness of ventilations in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and to identify the factors associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Methods: From out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) data prospectively collected from 2005 to 2011 in Japan, we extracted data for 210, 134 bystander-witnessed OHCAs with complete datasets but no prehospital involvement of physician [no BCPR, 115, 733; ventilation-only, 2093; compression-only, 61, 075; and conventional (compressions+ventilations) BCPR, 31, 233] and determined the factors associated with 1-month neurologically favourable survival using simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses. In 91, 885 patients with known BCPR durations, we determined the factors associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Results: The rate of survival in the no BCPR, ventilation-only, compression-only and conventional group was 2.8%, 3.9%, 4.5% and 5.0%, respectively. After adjustment for other factors associated with outcomes, the survival rate in the ventilation-only group was higher than that in the no BCPR group (adjusted OR; 95% CI, 1.29; 1.01–1.63), but lower than that in the compression-only (0.76; 0.59–0.96) or conventional groups (0.70; 0.55–0.89). Conventional CPR had the highest OR for survival in almost all OHCA subgroups. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for survival after dividing BCPR into ventilation and compression components was 1.19 (1.11–1.27) and 1.60 (1.51–1.69), respectively. OlderAbstract: Aim: To determine the effectiveness of ventilations in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and to identify the factors associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Methods: From out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) data prospectively collected from 2005 to 2011 in Japan, we extracted data for 210, 134 bystander-witnessed OHCAs with complete datasets but no prehospital involvement of physician [no BCPR, 115, 733; ventilation-only, 2093; compression-only, 61, 075; and conventional (compressions+ventilations) BCPR, 31, 233] and determined the factors associated with 1-month neurologically favourable survival using simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses. In 91, 885 patients with known BCPR durations, we determined the factors associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Results: The rate of survival in the no BCPR, ventilation-only, compression-only and conventional group was 2.8%, 3.9%, 4.5% and 5.0%, respectively. After adjustment for other factors associated with outcomes, the survival rate in the ventilation-only group was higher than that in the no BCPR group (adjusted OR; 95% CI, 1.29; 1.01–1.63), but lower than that in the compression-only (0.76; 0.59–0.96) or conventional groups (0.70; 0.55–0.89). Conventional CPR had the highest OR for survival in almost all OHCA subgroups. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for survival after dividing BCPR into ventilation and compression components was 1.19 (1.11–1.27) and 1.60 (1.51–1.69), respectively. Older guidelines, female sex, younger patient age, bystander-initiated CPR without instruction, early BCPR and short BCPR duration were associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Conclusions: Ventilation is a significant component of BCPR, but alone is less effective than compression in improving neurologically favourable survival after OHCAs. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Resuscitation. Volume 91(2015)
- Journal:
- Resuscitation
- Issue:
- Volume 91(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 91, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 91
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0091-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- 122
- Page End:
- 130
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06
- Subjects:
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest -- Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- Ventilation
Resuscitation -- Periodicals
Resuscitation -- Periodicals
Réanimation -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.025 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03009572 ↗
http://www.resuscitationjournal.com/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03009572 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03009572 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.033 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0300-9572
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7785.420000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7212.xml