The paradox of moral cleansing: When physical cleansing leads to increased contamination concerns. (December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The paradox of moral cleansing: When physical cleansing leads to increased contamination concerns. (December 2018)
- Main Title:
- The paradox of moral cleansing: When physical cleansing leads to increased contamination concerns
- Authors:
- Gilchrist, Philippe T.
Schnall, Simone - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background and objectives: Moral threats, including threats to moral self-worth, have been associated with contamination concerns. Paradoxically, although self-cleansing provides temporary relief, it can worsen feelings of contamination. Self-affirmation might be an effective strategy, especially following obsessive type cognitions (e.g., responsibility beliefs) when moral threats are reactivated. Methods: In Experiment 1, participants recalled an immoral deed and then self-cleansed (using a hand-wipe), completed a control task, or self-affirmed. Contamination concerns were subsequently measured by a washing task. In Experiment 2, the same procedure was used but obsessive-type cognitions were activated by asking participants a series of questions about obsessive beliefs. Results: As expected, relative to the control condition, both self-affirmation and self-cleansing resulted in less subsequent repeated washing behaviour in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, when the immoral recall was followed by activation of obsessive-type cognitions, self-cleansing led to more guilt and repeated washing than self-affirmation and control. Rather than alleviating feelings of contamination, physical self-cleansing led to more contamination concerns and guilt when in the context of activated obsessive-type cognitions, possibly because it paradoxically makes (moral) cleanliness goals salient. Limitations: Future research needs to test clinical populations, for whom contaminationAbstract: Background and objectives: Moral threats, including threats to moral self-worth, have been associated with contamination concerns. Paradoxically, although self-cleansing provides temporary relief, it can worsen feelings of contamination. Self-affirmation might be an effective strategy, especially following obsessive type cognitions (e.g., responsibility beliefs) when moral threats are reactivated. Methods: In Experiment 1, participants recalled an immoral deed and then self-cleansed (using a hand-wipe), completed a control task, or self-affirmed. Contamination concerns were subsequently measured by a washing task. In Experiment 2, the same procedure was used but obsessive-type cognitions were activated by asking participants a series of questions about obsessive beliefs. Results: As expected, relative to the control condition, both self-affirmation and self-cleansing resulted in less subsequent repeated washing behaviour in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, when the immoral recall was followed by activation of obsessive-type cognitions, self-cleansing led to more guilt and repeated washing than self-affirmation and control. Rather than alleviating feelings of contamination, physical self-cleansing led to more contamination concerns and guilt when in the context of activated obsessive-type cognitions, possibly because it paradoxically makes (moral) cleanliness goals salient. Limitations: Future research needs to test clinical populations, for whom contamination concerns are all the more central. Conclusions: This research provides further evidence of the influence of moral threat in contamination concerns, and the limits of moral cleansing. Self-affirmation resulted in less contamination concerns under both a neutral condition and activated obsessive type cognitions. Highlights: Self-affirmation and self-cleansing reduce contamination concerns following guilt. Following obsessive-type cognitions, self-cleansing raises contamination concerns. Results highlight the potential for detrimental effects of moral self-cleansing. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. Volume 61(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 61(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0061-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 38
- Page End:
- 44
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12
- Subjects:
- Behavior therapy -- Periodicals
616.89142 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00057916 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0005-7916
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4951.250000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7166.xml