What women want? Results from a prospective multicenter study on women's preference about pain management during labour. (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Favilli, Alessandro; Laganà, Antonio Simone; Indraccolo, Ugo; Righi, Alessandra; Triolo, Onofrio; Apolito, Maria D'; Gerli, Sandro
• Is Part Of: European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 228(2018)
• Page Start: 197
• Page End: 202
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: Epidural analgesia -- Questionnaire -- Labour -- Pain -- Women preference; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Reproductive health -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Reproduction -- Periodicals; Obstétrique -- Périodiques; Gynécologie -- Périodiques; Reproduction -- Périodiques; Verloskunde; Gynaecologie; Voortplanting (biologie); Gynecology; Obstetrics; Reproduction; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.038
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-2115

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to assess women preference about pain and duration of labour applying a standardized questionnaire. Study Design: A prospective multicentre large cohort study was carried out in two different University Hospitals. A standardized questionnaire was proposed before active labour and the day after delivery in order to investigate whether women preferred low pain intensity for a longer labour duration or greater pain intensity for a shorter labour duration. The studied population was divided and analysed in two groups according to Epidural Analgesia (EA) administration. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess which variables were able to influence the opinion about the pain perception after birth. Results: EA group showed an increased risk of episiotomy (p = 0.004), of longer duration of labour (Stage I, p < 0.001; Stage II, p = 0.002) and of oxytocin augmentation (P = 0.030). No statistical differences were found about the route of delivery between the two groups. Rates of pre-labour scores significantly differed from rates of post labour scores (p < 0.001). In the multivariable linear regression analysis, pre-labour score was directly related to post-labour score (p = 0.013). The EA was indirectly related to higher pain levels for a longer duration preference (p = 0.001), whereas oxytocic infusion in labour was directly related with preference for higher pain for a shorter duration (p = 0.011). Conclusions: Patients' preferences about labour are focused on both pain relief and labour duration. The standardized questionnaire could be a useful tool to screen patients eligible for EA.