Estimating Candidates' Political Orientation in a Polarized Congress. (26th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tausanovitch, Chris; Warshaw, Christopher
• Is Part Of: Political analysis. Volume 25:Number 2(2017)
• Page Start: 167
• Page End: 187
• Publication Date: 2017-04-26
• Subjects: Political science -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 320.011
• DOI: 10.1017/pan.2017.5
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1047-1987

Abstract

Abstract : Over the past decade, a number of new measures have been developed that attempt to capture the political orientation of both incumbent and nonincumbent candidates for Congress, as well as other offices, on the same scale. These measures pose the possibility of being able to answer a host of fundamental questions about political accountability and representation. In this paper, we examine the properties of six recent measures of candidates' political orientations in different domains. While these measures are commonly viewed as proxies for ideology, each involves very different choices, incentives, and contexts. Indeed, we show that there is only a weak relationship between these measures within party. This suggests that these measures are capturing domain-specific factors rather than just candidates' ideology. Moreover, these measures do poorly at distinguishing between moderate and extreme roll call voting records within each party. As a result, they fall short when it comes to facilitating empirical analysis of theories of accountability and representation in Congress. Overall, our findings suggest that future research should leverage the conceptual and empirical variation across these measures and avoid assuming they are synonymous with candidates' ideology.