Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?. (November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Birt, Linda; Scott, Suzanne; Cavers, Debbie; Campbell, Christine; Walter, Fiona
• Is Part Of: Qualitative health research. Volume 26:Number 13(2016)
• Page Start: 1802
• Page End: 1811
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Subjects: member checking -- trustworthiness -- respondent validation -- participant validation -- melanoma -- credibility -- qualitative method -- United Kingdom; Health -- Periodicals; Health behavior -- Periodicals; Health -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Health behavior -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 610.7205
• DOI: 10.1177/1049732316654870
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-7323

Abstract

The trustworthiness of results is the bedrock of high quality qualitative research. Member checking, also known as participant or respondent validation, is a technique for exploring the credibility of results. Data or results are returned to participants to check for accuracy and resonance with their experiences. Member checking is often mentioned as one in a list of validation techniques. This simplistic reporting might not acknowledge the value of using the method, nor its juxtaposition with the interpretative stance of qualitative research. In this commentary, we critique how member checking has been used in published research, before describing and evaluating an innovative in-depth member checking technique, Synthesized Member Checking. The method was used in a study with patients diagnosed with melanoma. Synthesized Member Checking addresses the co-constructed nature of knowledge by providing participants with the opportunity to engage with, and add to, interview and interpreted data, several months after their semi-structured interview.