Fasudil combined with methylcobalamin or lipoic acid can improve the nerve conduction velocity in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A meta-analysis. Issue 27 (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jiang, De-Qi; Xu, Lan-Cheng; Jiang, Li-Lin; Li, Ming-Xing; Wang, Yong
• Other Names: Chen. Weina section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 97:Issue 27(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: diabetic peripheral neuropathy -- efficacy -- fasudil -- lipoic acid -- meta-analysis -- methylcobalamin -- nerve conduction velocity; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011390
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Fasudil (F) plus methylcobalamin (M) or lipoic acid (L) treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic approach for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in numerous studies. However, the effect of the combined use still remains dubious. Objective: The aim of this report was to evaluate the efficacy of F plus M or L (F + M or F + L) for the treatment of DPN compared with that of M or L monotherapy, respectively, in order to provide the basis and reference for clinical rational drug use. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of F for DPN published up to September 2017 were searched. Relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 test. Sensitivity analyses were also performed. The outcomes measured were as follows: the clinical efficacy, median motor nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) (MNCVs), median sensory NCV (SNCV), peroneal MNCV, peroneal SNCV, and adverse effects. Results: Thirteen RCTs with 1148 participants were included. Clinical efficacy of F + M combination therapy was significantly better than M monotherapy (8 trials; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.17–1.35, P < .00001, I 2 = 0%), the efficacy of F + L combination therapy was also obviously better than L monotherapy (4 trials; RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16–1.39, P < .00001, I 2 = 0%). Compared with monotherapy, the pooled effects of combination therapy on NCV were (MD 6.69, 95% CI 4.74–8.64, P < .00001, I 2 = 92%) for median MNCV, (MD 6.71, 95% CI 1.77–11.65, P = .008, I 2 = 99%) for median SNCV, (MD 4.18, 95% CI 2.37–5.99, P < .00001, I 2 = 94%) for peroneal MNCV, (MD 5.89, 95% CI 3.57–8.20, P < .00001, I 2 = 95%) for peroneal SNCV. Furthermore, there were no serious adverse events associated with drug intervention. Conclusion: Combination therapy with F plus M or L was superior to M or L monotherapy for improvement of neuropathic symptoms and NCVs in DPN patients, respectively. Moreover, no serious adverse events occur in combination therapy.