Déjà lu: On the limits of data reuse across multiple publications. Issue 3 (June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van Raaij, Erik M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of purchasing and supply management. Volume 24:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 183
• Page End: 191
• Publication Date: 2018-06
• Subjects: Industrial procurement -- Europe -- Management -- Periodicals; Purchasing -- Europe -- Periodicals; Purchasing -- Europe -- Management -- Periodicals; Materials management -- Europe -- Periodicals; Industrial procurement -- Management; Materials management; Purchasing; Purchasing -- Management; Europe; Periodicals; 658.7205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2018.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1478-4092

Abstract

Abstract: Scholars in our field, Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM), are under high pressure to show research productivity. At most schools, this productivity is measured by the number of journal articles published. One possible response to such pressure is to improve research efficiency: publishing more journal articles from each data collection effort. In other words, using one dataset for multiple publications. As long as each publication makes a sufficient contribution, and authors ensure transparency in methods and consistency across publications, generating more than one publication from one data collection effort is possible. The aim of this Notes and Debates article, however, is to draw attention to inappropriate reuse of empirical data in OSCM research, to explain its implications and to suggest ways in which to promote research quality and integrity. Based on two cases of extensive data reuse in OSCM, eighteen problematic practices associated with the reuse of data across multiple journal articles are identified. Recommendations on this issue of data reuse are provided for authors, reviewers, editors and readers. Highlights: This article argues that data reuse is not a problem per se, but can be associated with questionable research practices. The article identifies 18 problematic practices associated with using the same data across multiple publications. Transparency in methods and consistency across publications are key to avoid the potential problems with data reuse. Most importantly, authors should ensure each publication makes a sufficient contribution. The 18 problematic practices and the recommendations can be used for training in research ethics.