Genomic comparison of Escherichia coli serotype O103:H2 isolates with and without verotoxin genes: implications for risk assessment of strains commonly found in ruminant reservoirs. Issue 1 (1st January 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Genomic comparison of Escherichia coli serotype O103:H2 isolates with and without verotoxin genes: implications for risk assessment of strains commonly found in ruminant reservoirs. Issue 1 (1st January 2016)
- Main Title:
- Genomic comparison of Escherichia coli serotype O103:H2 isolates with and without verotoxin genes: implications for risk assessment of strains commonly found in ruminant reservoirs
- Authors:
- Söderlund, Robert
Hurel, Julie
Jinnerot, Tomas
Sekse, Camilla
Aspán, Anna
Eriksson, Erik
Bongcam-Rudloff, Erik - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Escherichia coli O103:H2 occurs as verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) carrying only vtx 1 or vtx 2 or both variants, but also as vtx -negative atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC). The majority of E. coli O103:H2 identified from cases of human disease are caused by the VTEC form. If aEPEC strains frequently acquire verotoxin genes and become VTEC, they must be considered a significant public health concern. In this study, we have characterized and compared aEPEC and VTEC isolates of E. coli O103:H2 from Swedish cattle. Methods: Fourteen isolates of E. coli O103:H2 with and without verotoxin genes were collected from samples of cattle feces taken during a nationwide cattle prevalence study 2011–2012. Isolates were sequenced with a 2×100 bp setup on a HiSeq2500 instrument producing >100× coverage per isolate. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing was performed using the genome analysis tool kit (GATK). Virulence genes and other regions of interest were detected. Susceptibility to transduction by two verotoxin-encoding phages was investigated for one representative aEPEC O103:H2 isolate. Results and Discussion: This study shows that aEPEC O103:H2 is more commonly found (64%) than VTEC O103:H2 (36%) in the Swedish cattle reservoir. The only verotoxin gene variant identified was vtx 1a . Phylogenetic comparison by SNP analysis indicates that while certain subgroups of aEPEC and VTEC are closely related and have otherwise near identical virulence geneAbstract : Introduction: Escherichia coli O103:H2 occurs as verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) carrying only vtx 1 or vtx 2 or both variants, but also as vtx -negative atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC). The majority of E. coli O103:H2 identified from cases of human disease are caused by the VTEC form. If aEPEC strains frequently acquire verotoxin genes and become VTEC, they must be considered a significant public health concern. In this study, we have characterized and compared aEPEC and VTEC isolates of E. coli O103:H2 from Swedish cattle. Methods: Fourteen isolates of E. coli O103:H2 with and without verotoxin genes were collected from samples of cattle feces taken during a nationwide cattle prevalence study 2011–2012. Isolates were sequenced with a 2×100 bp setup on a HiSeq2500 instrument producing >100× coverage per isolate. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing was performed using the genome analysis tool kit (GATK). Virulence genes and other regions of interest were detected. Susceptibility to transduction by two verotoxin-encoding phages was investigated for one representative aEPEC O103:H2 isolate. Results and Discussion: This study shows that aEPEC O103:H2 is more commonly found (64%) than VTEC O103:H2 (36%) in the Swedish cattle reservoir. The only verotoxin gene variant identified was vtx 1a . Phylogenetic comparison by SNP analysis indicates that while certain subgroups of aEPEC and VTEC are closely related and have otherwise near identical virulence gene repertoires, they belong to separate lineages. This indicates that the uptake or loss of verotoxin genes is a rare event in the natural cattle environment of these bacteria. However, a representative of a VTEC-like aEPEC O103:H2 subgroup could be stably lysogenized by a vtx -encoding phage in vitro . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Infection ecology & epidemiology. Volume 6:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- Infection ecology & epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 6:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 6, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0006-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-01-01
- Subjects:
- VTEC -- STEC -- EHEC -- aEPEC -- cattle -- zoonosis -- next-generation sequencing -- high-throughput sequencing
Zoonoses -- Periodicals
Zoonoses -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Virology -- Periodicals
Bacteriology -- Periodicals
Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Bacteriology -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Virology -- Periodicals
Bacteriology
Epidemiology
Virology
Periodicals
614.56 - Journal URLs:
- http://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=a9h&jid=%22BOIW%22&scope=site ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1852 ↗
https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ziee20/current ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3402/iee.v6.30246 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2000-8686
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7083.xml