A Meta-Analysis of Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Management in Annual and Perennial Systems. Issue 4 (23rd July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davis, Stacy; Mangold, Jane; Menalled, Fabian; Orloff, Noelle; Miller, Zach; Lehnhoff, Erik
• Is Part Of: Weed science. Volume 66: Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 540
• Page End: 547
• Publication Date: 2018-07-23
• Subjects: J. Anita Dille, -- Kansas State University; Integrated management, -- invasive plants, -- literature review, -- noxious weeds, -- perennial weeds; 632.505
• DOI: 10.1017/wsc.2018.25
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1745

Abstract

Abstract: Field bindweed ( Convolvulus arvensis L.) is a persistent, perennial weed species that infests a variety of temperate habitats around the globe. To evaluate the efficacy of general management approaches and impacts on crop yield and to identify research gaps, we conducted a series of meta-analyses using published studies focusing on C. arvensis management in annual cropping and perennial systems. Our analysis of 48 articles (560 data points) conducted in annual systems indicated that 95% of data points measured efficacy over short time frames (within 2 yr of treatment). Furthermore, only 27% of data points reported impacts of C. arvensis management on crop yield. In annual systems, herbicide control dominated the literature (~80% of data points) and was an effective management technique up to 2 yr posttreatment. Integrated management, with or without herbicides, and three nonchemical techniques were similarly effective as herbicide at reducing C. arvensis up to 2 yr posttreatment. In addition, integrated approaches, with or without herbicides, and two nonchemical techniques had positive effects on crop yield. There were few differences among herbicide mechanism of action groups on C. arvensis abundance in annual systems. There were only nine articles (28 data points) concerning C. arvensis management in perennial systems (e.g., pasture, rangeland, lawn), indicating more research effort has been directed toward annual systems. In perennial systems, biocontrol, herbicide, and non-herbicide integrated management techniques were equally effective at reducing C. arvensis, while competition and grazing were not effective. Overall, our results demonstrate that while chemical control of C. arvensis is generally effective and well studied, integrated and nonchemical control practices can perform equally well. We also documented the need for improved monitoring of the efficacy of management practices over longer time frames and including effects on desired vegetation to develop sustainable weed management programs.