Practicing safety: a quality improvement intervention to test tools to enhance pediatric psychosocial care for children 0–3 years. Issue 4 (18th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abatemarco, Diane J.; Gubernick, Ruth S.; LaNoue, Marianna D.; Pohlig, Ryan T.; Slovin, Sara R.; Healy, Jill A.; Kairys, Steven
• Is Part Of: Primary health care research & development. Volume 19:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 365
• Page End: 377
• Publication Date: 2017-12-18
• Subjects: abuse and neglect, -- infant crying, -- maternal depression, -- quality improvement, -- toxic stress; Family medicine -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Primary care (Medicine) -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 362.1094105
• DOI: 10.1017/S1463423617000810
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1463-4236

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Child maltreatment is a significant public health issue in the United States. Yet, fewer than half of pediatricians discuss behavioral, developmental, or parenting issues with parents. Objective: This paper describes the testing of bundles of tools and processes, part of a larger intervention, Practicing Safety, targeted at changing physician and staff behavior to identify families at risk for child maltreatment, provide anticipatory guidance, refer to community resources, and follow-up and track at-risk families. The intervention was implemented with 14 pediatric primary care practices throughout the United States; the study was completed in 2011. Methods: A within-subjects repeated measures pre-post follow-up design was used to evaluate the intervention. Baseline and repeated measurements of pediatric practices' processes were collected using qualitative and quantitative methods. In total, 14 core improvement teams from across the country tested three bundles of tools (maternal, infant, toddler) within a quality improvement framework over seven months. Results: Quantitative results showed statistically significant adoption of tools and processes and enhancement of practice behaviors and office environmental supports. The increase in tool use was immediate and was sustained for six months after implementation. Qualitative data provided insight as to how meaningful the intervention was to the core improvement teams, especially with more complicated behaviors (eg, engaging social workers or community agencies for referrals). Barriers included lack of community resources. Findings showed unanticipated outcomes such as helping practices to become medical homes. Conclusion: Lessons learned included that practices appreciate and can adopt brief interventions that have meaningful and useful tools and process to enhance psychosocial care for children 0–3 and that do not place a burden on pediatric practice. An innovative, quality improvement strategy, intuitive to pediatricians, with a brief intervention may help prevent child maltreatment.