Impact of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction on interreader agreement in coronary artery measurements. Issue 94 (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gassenmaier, Tobias; Distelmaier, Isabel; Weng, Andreas M.; Bley, Thorsten A.; Klink, Thorsten
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 94(2017)
• Page Start: 201
• Page End: 208
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: bpm beats per minute -- CAD coronary artery disease -- cCTA coronary computed tomography angiography -- FBP filtered back projection -- FWHM full width at half maximum -- HU Hounsfield units -- IR iterative reconstruction -- kVp kilovoltage peak -- mSv millisievert -- SD standard deviation; CT -- Coronary CT angiography -- Iterative reconstruction -- Coronary plaque; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.06.029
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: Bias and variance of readers for lumen measurements significantly decrease with IR. Plaque density measurements correlate closely in both IR and FBP. Inter-reader agreement for measurements of degree of stenosis is significantly higher using IR. Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the influence of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) on coronary artery computed tomography angiography (cCTA) measurements in comparison to filtered back projection (FBP). Material and methods: Phantom scans and coronary CTA studies of 27 patients were acquired with a third generation dual-source CT scanner. Images were reconstructed using FBP and ADMIRE. Phantom measurements were used as reference standard. In patient studies, representative axial slices of each coronary artery segment without (n = 308) and with coronary plaques (n = 40) were assessed in identical positions for comparison of FBP and ADMIRE reconstructions. Image analyses included quality assessment, phantom and coronary artery measurements, plaque analysis, and interreader agreement of two independent and blinded readers. Results: Mean image noise was lower on ADMIRE reconstructions with 31.3 ± 9.9 HU compared to 55.9 ± 15.7 HU on FBP reconstructions (p < 0.001). Measurement precision and interreader agreement of both observers were assessed satisfactorily on phantom images in comparison to the full width half maximum method. In patients, correlation of lumen diameters of both observers improved using ADMIRE with a Pearson's r = 0.987 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.983–0.989; p < 0.001) compared to FBP images with r = 0.939 (95% CI, 0.924–0.951; p < 0.001). Applying ADMIRE, agreement of both observers for lumen diameter measurements significantly increased (p < 0.001). This was also observed for the degree of stenosis (p < 0.001) with r = 0.560 using FBP (95% CI, 0.301–0.742) and with r = 0.818 using ADMIRE (95% CI, 0.680–0.900). Plaque density measurements correlated closely with a Pearson's r of 0.951 in FBP (95% CI, 0.909–0.974) and 0.967 in ADMIRE (95% CI, 0.939–0.983). Conclusions: Advanced modeled iterative reconstruction significantly improves coronary artery assessment in coronary CTA in comparison to FBP by improved image quality due to image noise removal. This renders improved interobserver agreement for coronary lumen diameter and degree of stenosis measurements without influencing mean plaque attenuation.