Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings. (30th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pleus, Stefan; Schoemaker, Michael; Morgenstern, Karin; Schmelzeisen-Redeker, Günther; Haug, Cornelia; Link, Manuela; Zschornack, Eva; Freckmann, Guido
• Is Part Of: Journal of diabetes science and technology. Volume 9:Number 4(2015:Jul.)
• Page Start: 801
• Page End: 807
• Publication Date: 2015-06-30
• Subjects: continuous glucose monitoring -- accuracy -- rate of change -- MARD -- PARD; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Medical technology -- Periodicals; Diabetes Mellitus -- Periodicals; 616.462005
• DOI: 10.1177/1932296815578716
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1932-2968

Abstract

Introduction: The accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is often assessed with respect to blood glucose (BG) readings. CGM readings are affected by a physiological and a technical time delay when compared to BG readings. In this analysis, the dependence of CGM performance parameters on the BG rate of change was investigated for 2 CGM systems. Methods: Data from a previously published study were retrospectively analyzed. An established CGM system (Dexcom G4, Dexcom, San Diego, CA; system A) and a prototype system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany; system B) with 2 sensors each were worn by 10 subjects in parallel. Glucose swings were induced to achieve rapidly changing BG concentrations. Mean absolute relative differences (MARD) were calculated in different BG rate-of-change categories. In addition, sensor-to-sensor precision was assessed. Results: At BG rates of change of –1 mg/dl/min to 0 mg/dl/min and 0 mg/dl/min to +1 mg/dl/min, MARD results were 12.6% and 11.3% for system A and 8.2% and 10.0% for system B. At rapidly changing BG concentrations (<–3 mg/dl/min and ≥+3 mg/dl/min), higher MARD results were found for both systems, but system B was less affected (system A: 24.9% and 29.6%, system B: 10.6% and 16.3%). The impact of rate of change on sensor-to-sensor precision was less pronounced. Conclusions: Both systems were affected by rapidly changing BG concentrations to some degree, although system B was mostly unaffected by decreasing BG concentrations. It would seem that technological advancements in CGM systems might allow for a more precise tracking of BG concentrations even at rapidly changing BG concentrations.