Minimally invasive surgical approach for radicalization of incidental post-cholecystectomy gallbladder carcinoma: safety, feasibility and outcomes. Issue 4 (4th July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sinagra, Emanuele; Garritano, Stefano; Iacopinelli, Salvatore Marco; Messina, Marco; Raimondo, Dario; Rossi, Francesca; Spada, Massimiliano; Martorana, Guido; Spampinato, Marcello Giuseppe
• Is Part Of: Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies. Volume 27:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 217
• Page End: 220
• Publication Date: 2018-07-04
• Subjects: Gallbladder -- carcinoma -- laparoscopic cholecystectomy -- robotic surgery; Endoscopy -- Periodicals; Interventional radiology -- Periodicals; Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.05
• DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1410489
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-5706

Abstract

Abstract: Background and aims: Gallbladder carcinoma is a rare but aggressive malignant neoplasm. The incidence of intra- or post-operative incidental gallbladder carcinoma diagnosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is estimated to be 1–2%. Aggressive re-resection is warranted as the majority of patients have residual disease either in the liver or the lymph nodes. However the use of a minimally invasive surgical approach (MISA) to perform a radicalization in these patients has not been investigated yet. We retrospectively analyzed surgical and oncologic outcome of a small selected cohort of patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma whom underwent redo radicalization surgery by MISA. Material and methods: From April 2012 to June 2014 at our department six patients (three females and three males) with incidental findings of gallbladder carcinoma pT1b (stage I) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and referred to our center from other secondary-level referral hospitals, underwent a redo surgery for radicalization by means of laparoscopic (n. 3) or robotic approach (n. 3). A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data was performed. Results: The redo procedure consisted of a liver resection (segments IVb + V) and lymph nodes clearance of hepatoduodenal hilum and common hepatic artery. Conversion rate was zero. Median operative time was 290 (250–310) min. Estimate blood loss was 175 (100–350) ml. Total hospital stay was 6 (5–10) days. All liver resections were performed without inflow vascular clamping. One patient was re-operated for hemoperitoneum while peri-operative mortality was zero. Oncologically, an R0 resection was always achieved with a mean number of lymph nodes retrieved of 17, 5 (14–22). The stage of the neoplasm was confirmed in all cases but one, who was found to have a pN1 status (stage IIIb). At 21 (6–32) months follow-up all patients are alive and no recurrence has been observed. Conclusions: Our data suggest that radicalization of patients with stage I incidental postoperative gallbladder carcinoma can be done by a MISA without compromising the oncologic outcome. Larger studies are needed to validate these results.