Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2). Issue 10116 (13th January 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2). Issue 10116 (13th January 2018)
- Main Title:
- Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2)
- Authors:
- Reignier, Jean
Boisramé-Helms, Julie
Brisard, Laurent
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste
Ait Hssain, Ali
Anguel, Nadia
Argaud, Laurent
Asehnoune, Karim
Asfar, Pierre
Bellec, Frédéric
Botoc, Vlad
Bretagnol, Anne
Bui, Hoang-Nam
Canet, Emmanuel
Da Silva, Daniel
Darmon, Michael
Das, Vincent
Devaquet, Jérôme
Djibre, Michel
Ganster, Frédérique
Garrouste-Orgeas, Maité
Gaudry, Stéphane
Gontier, Olivier
Guérin, Claude
Guidet, Bertrand
Guitton, Christophe
Herbrecht, Jean-Etienne
Lacherade, Jean-Claude
Letocart, Philippe
Martino, Frédéric
Maxime, Virginie
Mercier, Emmanuelle
Mira, Jean-Paul
Nseir, Saad
Piton, Gael
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Richecoeur, Jack
Rigaud, Jean-Philippe
Robert, René
Rolin, Nathalie
Schwebel, Carole
Sirodot, Michel
Tinturier, François
Thévenin, Didier
Giraudeau, Bruno
Le Gouge, Amélie
… (more) - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Whether the route of early feeding affects outcomes of patients with severe critical illnesses is controversial. We hypothesised that outcomes were better with early first-line enteral nutrition than with early first-line parenteral nutrition. Methods: In this randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2 trial) done at 44 French intensive-care units (ICUs), adults (18 years or older) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support for shock were randomly assigned (1:1) to either parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition, both targeting normocaloric goals (20–25 kcal/kg per day), within 24 h after intubation. Randomisation was stratified by centre using permutation blocks of variable sizes. Given that route of nutrition cannot be masked, blinding of the physicians and nurses was not feasible. Patients receiving parenteral nutrition could be switched to enteral nutrition after at least 72 h in the event of shock resolution (no vasopressor support for 24 consecutive hours and arterial lactate <2 mmol/L). The primary endpoint was mortality on day 28 after randomisation in the intention-to-treat-population. This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT01802099 . Findings: After the second interim analysis, the independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board deemed that completing patient enrolment was unlikely to significantly change the results of the trial and recommended stopping patientSummary: Background: Whether the route of early feeding affects outcomes of patients with severe critical illnesses is controversial. We hypothesised that outcomes were better with early first-line enteral nutrition than with early first-line parenteral nutrition. Methods: In this randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2 trial) done at 44 French intensive-care units (ICUs), adults (18 years or older) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support for shock were randomly assigned (1:1) to either parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition, both targeting normocaloric goals (20–25 kcal/kg per day), within 24 h after intubation. Randomisation was stratified by centre using permutation blocks of variable sizes. Given that route of nutrition cannot be masked, blinding of the physicians and nurses was not feasible. Patients receiving parenteral nutrition could be switched to enteral nutrition after at least 72 h in the event of shock resolution (no vasopressor support for 24 consecutive hours and arterial lactate <2 mmol/L). The primary endpoint was mortality on day 28 after randomisation in the intention-to-treat-population. This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT01802099 . Findings: After the second interim analysis, the independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board deemed that completing patient enrolment was unlikely to significantly change the results of the trial and recommended stopping patient recruitment. Between March 22, 2013, and June 30, 2015, 2410 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned; 1202 to the enteral group and 1208 to the parenteral group. By day 28, 443 (37%) of 1202 patients in the enteral group and 422 (35%) of 1208 patients in the parenteral group had died (absolute difference estimate 2·0%; [95% CI −1·9 to 5·8]; p=0·33). Cumulative incidence of patients with ICU-acquired infections did not differ between the enteral group (173 [14%]) and the parenteral group (194 [16%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·89 [95% CI 0·72–1·09]; p=0·25). Compared with the parenteral group, the enteral group had higher cumulative incidences of patients with vomiting (406 [34%] vs 246 [20%]; HR 1·89 [1·62–2·20]; p<0·0001), diarrhoea (432 [36%] vs 393 [33%]; 1·20 [1·05–1·37]; p=0·009), bowel ischaemia (19 [2%] vs five [<1%]; 3·84 [1·43–10·3]; p=0·007), and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (11 [1%] vs three [<1%]; 3·7 [1·03–13·2; p=0·04). Interpretation: In critically ill adults with shock, early isocaloric enteral nutrition did not reduce mortality or the risk of secondary infections but was associated with a greater risk of digestive complications compared with early isocaloric parenteral nutrition. Funding: La Roche-sur-Yon Departmental Hospital and French Ministry of Health. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet. Volume 391:Issue 10116(2017)
- Journal:
- Lancet
- Issue:
- Volume 391:Issue 10116(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 391, Issue 10116 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 391
- Issue:
- 10116
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0391-10116-0000
- Page Start:
- 133
- Page End:
- 143
- Publication Date:
- 2018-01-13
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine
Medicine
Electronic journals
Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.thelancet.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01406736 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32146-3 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0140-6736
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 7017.xml