Complications after prominent ear correction: A systematic review of the literature. Issue 8 (August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sadhra, S.S.; Motahariasl, S.; Hardwicke, J.T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 70:Issue 8(2017:Aug.)
• Page Start: 1083
• Page End: 1090
• Publication Date: 2017-08
• Subjects: Complications -- Haematoma -- Otoplasty -- Pinnaplasty -- Prominent ears -- Bat ears; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 617.9505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.033
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-6815

Abstract

Summary: Background: There is great diversity in reported post-operative outcomes for otoplasty, with the incidence of haematoma or infection ranging from 0% to 15.6% and 0%–10%, respectively. With such variability, it is difficult to determine an overall 'average' incidence of common post-operative complications. Methods: A systematic review of the most relevant medical databases was conducted for studies available in English published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015. Using the dataset, pooled estimates for the incidence of the primary and secondary outcomes were calculated for all included studies. The primary outcome was haematoma and/or bleeding incidence, and the secondary outcomes included infection, skin/wound healing problems, suture-related problems, scarring, pain and itching, and revision surgeries/recurrence. Comparable sub-group analysis of studies was also performed using calculated pooled proportions. Results: After screening, 28 articles involving 3493 patients were included in the study. Pooled proportions revealed that haematoma and/or bleeding incidence was 2.5% (95% CI: 1.4–3.8%), infection 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4–1.3%), skin/wound healing problems 3% (95% CI: 1.4–5.1%), suture-related problems 1.8% (95% CI: 0.8–3.2%), scarring 1.6% (95% CI: 0.8–2.6%), pain and itching 13% (95% CI: 5.4–23.1%) and revision surgeries/recurrence 5% (95% CI: 2.9–7.7%). Conclusions: By pooling proportions of reported complications, the results of this study could be useful in the personal audit of practice and will be a point of reference for comparing novel surgical techniques in the future.