An empirical ethical analysis of community treatment orders within mental health services in England. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dunn, Michael; Canvin, Krysia; Rugkåsa, Jorun; Sinclair, Julia; Burns, Tom
• Is Part Of: Clinical ethics. Volume 11:Number 4(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 130
• Page End: 139
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Community treatment orders -- mental health -- psychiatry -- psychiatric ethics; Medical ethics -- Periodicals; 174.205
• DOI: 10.1177/1477750916657654
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-7509

Abstract

Community treatment orders are a legal mechanism to extend powers of compulsion into outpatient mental health settings in certain circumstances. Previous ethical analyses of these powers have explored a perceived tension between a duty to respect personal freedoms and autonomy and a duty to ensure that patients with the most complex needs are able to receive beneficial care and support that maximises their welfare in the longer-term. This empirical ethics paper presents an analysis of 75 interviews with psychiatrists, patients and family carers to show how these ethical considerations map onto the different ways that community treatment orders are used and experienced in practice. A complex and nuanced account of how the requirements to respect patients' autonomy, to respect patients' liberty and to act beneficently should be interpreted in order to make judgements about the ethics of community treatment orders is presented. The article argues that, due to such complexity, no general ethical justification for community treatment orders can be provided, but a justification on the basis of the promotion of patients' autonomy could provide an ethical reason for community mental health practitioners to make use of a community treatment order in some limited circumstances.