Laparoscopy-assisted versus open and pure laparoscopic approach for liver resection and living donor hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 8 (August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Coelho, Fabricio F.; Bernardo, Wanderley M.; Kruger, Jaime A.P.; Jeismann, Vagner B.; Fonseca, Gilton M.; Macacari, Rodrigo L.; Cesconetto, Danielle M.; D'Albuquerque, Luiz A.C.; Cecconello, Ivan; Herman, Paulo
• Is Part Of: HPB. Volume 20:Issue 8(2018)
• Page Start: 687
• Page End: 694
• Publication Date: 2018-08
• Subjects: Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.362005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.379
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1365-182X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Laparoscopy-assisted (hybrid) liver surgery is considered a minimally invasive technique, however there are doubts regarding loss of the benefits of laparoscopy due to the use of an auxiliary incision. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative results of hybrid vs. open and hybrid vs. pure laparoscopic approach to liver resection for focal lesions and living donation. Methods: A systematic review was performed in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library Central and LILACS databases. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: 21 studies were included. Hybrid vs. open: operative time was lower in open group (mean difference [MD] = 34 min; 95%CI: 22–47; P < 0.001; N = 669). Hybrid technique was associated with a reduction in operative blood loss [MD = −43 ml; 95%CI: −74–(−13); P = 0.005, N = 1738]; shorter hospital stay [MD = −1.9 days; 95%CI: −3.2–(−0.5); P = 0.008; N = 833] and lower morbidity [risk difference (RD) = −0.05; 95%CI: −0.10–(−0.01); P = 0.010; N = 1359]. Hybrid vs. pure laparoscopic: There was no difference regarding blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay and morbimortality. Discussion: Hybrid technique had perioperative outcomes that were more in keeping with pure laparoscopic outcomes than open surgery. Hybrid liver surgery should be considered a minimally invasive approach.