Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta‐percha from curved root canals assessed by micro‐CT. (14th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rödig, T.; Wagner, J.; Wiegand, A.; Rizk, M.
• Is Part Of: International endontic journal. Volume 51:Number 7(2018)
• Page Start: 808
• Page End: 815
• Publication Date: 2018-02-14
• Subjects: curved root canals -- GuttaCore -- micro‐CT -- ProTaper retreatment files -- retreatment -- Thermafil; Endodontics -- Periodicals; 617.6342
• DOI: 10.1111/iej.12893
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-2885

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To evaluate ex vivo the efficacy of ProTaper Universal Retreatment files (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore (both Dentsply Sirona) or vertically compacted gutta‐percha from curved root canals using micro‐CT. Methodology: Sixty curved molar roots with the same mean canal curvatures and radii in two directions were prepared using ProFile instruments (Dentsply Sirona) to size 30 with .04 taper and obturated with either Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta‐percha and AH Plus ( n = 20). Specimens were retreated using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment files D1, D2 and D3 to working length, and root canal preparation was completed with ProTaper Next (Dentsply Sirona) to size ×4. Percentages of residual filling material and dentine removal were assessed using micro‐CT imaging. Working time and procedural errors were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. Results: No significant differences between carrier‐based and warm vertical compaction regarding residual filling material (14.2–19.3%) and dentine removal (2.7–3.2 mm 3 ) were detected ( P > 0.05). Time to reach working length was significantly faster for canals filled with GuttaCore than that observed for Thermafil and warm vertical compaction ( P < 0.05). Five lateral perforations with the D3 file occurred during retreatment, one in the Thermafil and four in the vertical compaction group. Conclusions: Remaining filling material and dentine removal were similar for all canal filling techniques. Regaining working length was significantly faster for GuttaCore compared with Thermafil and vertically compacted gutta‐percha. Procedural errors occurred during retreatment of severely curved root canals with the ProTaper Universal Retreatment files in 5 of 60 canals (8%).