A general solution for tide‐induced groundwater fluctuation in an estuarine‐coastal confined and unconfined aquifer system. Issue 14 (20th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fang, Hsi‐Ting; Tan, Yih‐Chi; Chuang, Mo‐Hsiung; Ke, Kai‐Yuan; Chen, Po‐Chia
• Is Part Of: Hydrological processes. Volume 32:Issue 14(2018)
• Page Start: 2239
• Page End: 2253
• Publication Date: 2018-06-20
• Subjects: damping effect -- dimensionless extended length -- dimensionless transmissivity -- estuarine‐coastal aquifer system -- head fluctuations -- loading effect -- tidal‐river confined aquifer -- transmissivity anisotropy; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Research -- Periodicals; Hydrologic models -- Periodicals; Hydrological forecasting -- Periodicals; 631.432
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13161
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6087

Abstract

Abstract: This paper presents an analytical solution to tide‐induced head fluctuations in a two‐dimensional estuarine‐coastal aquifer system that consists of an unconfined aquifer and a heterogeneous confined aquifer extending under a tidal river with a semipermeable layer between them. This study considers the joint effects of tidal‐river leakage, inland leakage, dimensionless transmissivity between the tidal‐river and inland confined aquifer, and transmissivity anisotropic ratios. The analytical solution for this model is obtained via the separation of variables method. Three existing solutions related to head fluctuation in one‐ or two‐dimensional leaky confined aquifers are considered as special cases in the present solution. This study shows that there is a threshold of tidal‐river confined aquifer length. When the tidal‐river length is greater than the threshold length, the inland head fluctuations remain sensitive to the leakage effect but become insensitive to the tidal‐river width and dimensionless transmissivity. Considering leakage and transmissivity anisotropy, this study also demonstrates that at a location farther from the river–inland boundary, head fluctuations increase with increasing leakage and transmissivity anisotropy; the maximum head fluctuation occurs when leakage and transmissivity anisotropy are both at their maximum values. The combined action of the 3 effects of loading, tidal‐river aquifer leakage, and inland aquifer leakage differs significantly according to various aquifer parameters. The analytical solution in this paper can be applied to demonstrate the behaviours of the head fluctuations of an estuarine‐coastal aquifer system, and the head fluctuations can be clearly described when the tidal and hydrogeological parameters are derived from field measurement data or hypothetical cases.