Circulating non-hematological cells during cardiopulmonary bypass: new findings in cardiac surgery procedures. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Santise, Gianluca; Marinaro, Cinzia; Maselli, Daniele; Dominici, Carmelo; Di Vito, Anna; Donato, Giuseppe; Camastra, Caterina; Zeppa, Pio; Barni, Tullio; Rizzuto, Antonia; Viglietto, Giuseppe; Mignogna, Chiara
• Is Part Of: Perfusion. Volume 31:Number 7(2016)
• Page Start: 584
• Page End: 592
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: CPB -- inflammatory response -- pathophysiology -- embolism (microvascular, circulating non-hematological cells); Perfusion (Physiology) -- Periodicals; Blood -- Circulation, Artificial -- Periodicals; Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Extracorporeal Circulation -- Periodicals; Perfusion -- Periodicals; Circulation extracorporelle -- Périodiques; Perfusion -- Périodiques; 617.41
• DOI: 10.1177/0267659116638916
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0267-6591

Abstract

Background: Several factors have been historically advocated to explain the coagulative and inflammatory disorders following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In this paper, we describe the presence of circulating non-hematological cells, introduced within the bloodstream during CPB. We defined the origin of the cells and tested their impact on coagulation. Methods: We collected peripheral arterial blood samples in twenty consecutive coronary artery bypass graft cases at four different surgical moments and assessed the presence and nature of circulating cells with the use of the CELLSEARCH® Test, immunocytochemistry and immunofluorescence, evaluating the expression of cytokeratin and calretinin. The effect of the circulating non-hematological cells on coagulation was tested in vitro, using the ROTEM assay. Results: A mean of 263.85 ± 57.5 (median 258.5) cells were present in the samples following the suction of blood from the surgical field while all the other samples were negative (zero cells) (p<0.00001). Immunologic tests confirmed the mesothelial origin of the cells. The ROTEM® assay of the blood samples contaminated by the mesothelial cells presented longer clotting times (53.4 ± 8.2 secs 48.3 ± 8.9 sec, p=0.05), longer clot formation times (137.1 ± 31.5 sec vs 111.9 ± 25.2 sec, p=0.009), smaller alfa angle amplitudes (66.7 ± 9.1° vs 71.1 ± 5.1°, p=0.04) and maximum clot firmness times (59.0 ± 5.4 sec vs 61.9 ±4.6 sec, p=0.004) than the controls. Conclusion: The presence of circulating non-hematological cells during CPB with a mesothelial immunophenotype alters in vitro coagulation assays. This finding can help to further understand the pathophysiology of CPB.