Bodo ethnic self-rule and persistent violence in Assam: A failed case of multinational federalism in India. Issue 4 (8th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bhattacharyya, Harihar; Mukherjee, Jhumpa
• Is Part Of: Regional & federal studies. Volume 28:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 469
• Page End: 487
• Publication Date: 2018-08-08
• Subjects: India -- north east -- Bodoland -- ethnic conflict -- multinational federalism; Regionalism -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Federal government -- Periodicals; 321.02
• DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2018.1478293
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-7566

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Indian federalism has been credited in the literature on comparative federalism for having successfully resolved many of its ethnic conflicts (in a country of immense ethnic diversity) since 1956 by conceding varied forms of statehood. In most cases, the resolution of ethnic conflict has entailed self-determination for ethno-nationalist groups. There are however cases when the experiment has failed and the institutional arrangements for recognition of ethnic self-determination have given birth to more conflicts and persistent violence. In this article, we argue that the Bodoland Territorial Authority (created in 2003) in Assam is a failed case of multinational federalism in India. We argue that the case of Bodoland illustrates the limits of territorial management when groups are intermixed and highlight the need for power sharing in government and/or non-territorial representation as a better method for managing ethnic conflict in such cases.