Early Versus Late Amniotomy in Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor [20E]. (May 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Early Versus Late Amniotomy in Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor [20E]. (May 2018)
- Main Title:
- Early Versus Late Amniotomy in Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor [20E]
- Authors:
- Doulaveris, Georgios
Powell, Kristin
Fisher, Nelli
Frieden, Faith
Stone, Joanne
Bernstein, Peter - Abstract:
- Abstract : INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to investigate the effect of early versus late amniotomy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of nulliparous patients undergoing induction of labor in seven academic New York hospitals over one year (2016) derived from a quality improvement database. Nulliparous women with a singleton gestation undergoing induction of labor requiring an amniotomy were included. Data selected for this analysis included timing of amniotomy, obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Early amniotomy was defined as artificially ruptured membranes prior to the active phase and late amniotomy after the onset of active phase of labor. Results were compared between early and late amniotomy groups. Standard univariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 7104 medical charts were reviewed. 411 (5.8%) patients were nulliparous, undergoing induction of labor that required artificial rupture of membranes. 249 (60.6%) patients had an early and 162 (39.4%) patients had a late amniotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups in the rates of cesarean delivery (17.8% vs. 16%), operative delivery (10.8% vs. 8%), chorioamnionitis (5% vs. 6.8%), admission to neonatal ICU (6.6% vs. 8.6%) or an Apgar score less than 7 at one minute (7% vs. 6.2%). Women that underwent an early amniotomy had shorter active phase of labor (277.1 ± 11.4 mins vs. 347.8 ± 19.8Abstract : INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to investigate the effect of early versus late amniotomy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of nulliparous patients undergoing induction of labor in seven academic New York hospitals over one year (2016) derived from a quality improvement database. Nulliparous women with a singleton gestation undergoing induction of labor requiring an amniotomy were included. Data selected for this analysis included timing of amniotomy, obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Early amniotomy was defined as artificially ruptured membranes prior to the active phase and late amniotomy after the onset of active phase of labor. Results were compared between early and late amniotomy groups. Standard univariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 7104 medical charts were reviewed. 411 (5.8%) patients were nulliparous, undergoing induction of labor that required artificial rupture of membranes. 249 (60.6%) patients had an early and 162 (39.4%) patients had a late amniotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups in the rates of cesarean delivery (17.8% vs. 16%), operative delivery (10.8% vs. 8%), chorioamnionitis (5% vs. 6.8%), admission to neonatal ICU (6.6% vs. 8.6%) or an Apgar score less than 7 at one minute (7% vs. 6.2%). Women that underwent an early amniotomy had shorter active phase of labor (277.1 ± 11.4 mins vs. 347.8 ± 19.8 mins, p= 0.0009). CONCLUSION: Early amniotomy in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor may shorten the active phase of labor without increasing the risk of adverse obstetric or neonatal outcomes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 131(2018)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 131(2018)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 131, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 131
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0131-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2018-05
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000533039.81448.fc ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6896.xml