Outcomes of Robotic vs. Total Abdominal Hysterectomy Stratified by Age Group for Patients with Endometrial Cancer [19A]. (May 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Outcomes of Robotic vs. Total Abdominal Hysterectomy Stratified by Age Group for Patients with Endometrial Cancer [19A]. (May 2018)
- Main Title:
- Outcomes of Robotic vs. Total Abdominal Hysterectomy Stratified by Age Group for Patients with Endometrial Cancer [19A]
- Authors:
- Javadian, Pouya
Juusela, Alexander
Anderson, Patrick - Abstract:
- Abstract : INTRODUCTION: To compare clinical and pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcomes stratified by age in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent Robotic-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy (RALTH) vs. Total Abdominal Hysterectomy METHODS: All women with surgically treated endometrial cancer at the Newark Beth Israel Medical Center between January 2004 and December 2015 were eligible; 353 patients met criteria and underwent retrospective chart review. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on age the ranges <45, 46-64 and >65 years. Demographic data, pathologic, surgical treatment and complications were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences regarding operation characteristics and complications in patients with age <45 years. In patients of age between 46-64 years, there was a statistically significant increased estimated blood loss (EBL), median (range), (400 (50-6000) cc vs. 100 (20-7000) cc, p : <0.001) and length of stay (LOS) 4 (1-51) vs. 1.5 (1-41) days, p : <0.001 in the TAH group compared to the RALTH group. Patients who underwent RALTH experienced longer operative time than the TAH group (234.3±81.2 vs. 259.5±68.4, p:0.039). In patients with age >65 years, LOS [7 (2-39) vs. 2 (1-43) days, p<0.001] and intra-operative hemorrhage [14/79 (17.7%) vs. 1/78 (1.2%), p<0.001] were significantly higher in TAH than the RALTH patients. CONCLUSION:Abstract : INTRODUCTION: To compare clinical and pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcomes stratified by age in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent Robotic-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy (RALTH) vs. Total Abdominal Hysterectomy METHODS: All women with surgically treated endometrial cancer at the Newark Beth Israel Medical Center between January 2004 and December 2015 were eligible; 353 patients met criteria and underwent retrospective chart review. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on age the ranges <45, 46-64 and >65 years. Demographic data, pathologic, surgical treatment and complications were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences regarding operation characteristics and complications in patients with age <45 years. In patients of age between 46-64 years, there was a statistically significant increased estimated blood loss (EBL), median (range), (400 (50-6000) cc vs. 100 (20-7000) cc, p : <0.001) and length of stay (LOS) 4 (1-51) vs. 1.5 (1-41) days, p : <0.001 in the TAH group compared to the RALTH group. Patients who underwent RALTH experienced longer operative time than the TAH group (234.3±81.2 vs. 259.5±68.4, p:0.039). In patients with age >65 years, LOS [7 (2-39) vs. 2 (1-43) days, p<0.001] and intra-operative hemorrhage [14/79 (17.7%) vs. 1/78 (1.2%), p<0.001] were significantly higher in TAH than the RALTH patients. CONCLUSION: Older patients with endometrial cancer benefit from the lower rate of postoperative complications with RALTH than TAH. Patients undergoing RALTH benefit from decreased postoperative morbidity. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 131(2018)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 131(2018)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 131, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 131
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0131-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2018-05
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000532882.34402.42 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6896.xml