Can integrated infrastructure investment plans contribute to more effective public spending? The case of Mozambique. Issue 4 (4th July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Muller, Mike; Zandamela, Horacio
• Is Part Of: Development Southern Africa. Volume 35:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 511
• Page End: 526
• Publication Date: 2018-07-04
• Subjects: Infrastructure -- development planning -- budgeting -- Mozambique; Economic development -- Africa, Southern -- Periodicals; Africa, Southern -- Economic conditions -- Periodicals; 338.90096805
• DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2018.1486179
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0376-835X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: All countries, especially developing countries with limited financial resources, face difficult decisions in prioritising public funds for investment projects in the face of multiple demands in order to achieve strategic public goals. Effective investment often requires coordination between different institutions and the management of political pressure to divert investment in support of private interests. It also requires the identification of appropriate sources of funds for different purposes. The preparation of an integrated infrastructure investment plan (IIIP) that uses structured approaches to review investment proposals has been suggested, and adopted in some cases, as an instrument to address these challenges and bridge the gap between national planning and sectoral budgeting. This article considers the experience of Mozambique in deploying an IIIP as well as some recent events and concludes that the instrument may be helpful as part of a system of investment planning and allocation but that it has significant limitations.