P55. Probing homeostatic and metaplastic mechanisms of quadri-pulse theta burst stimulation using an inhibitory priming protocol. Issue 8 (August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Asenbauer, E.; Gleich, B.; Gattinger, N.; Siebner, H.; Mall, V.; Jung, N.
• Is Part Of: Clinical neurophysiology. Volume 129:Issue 8(2018:Aug.)
• Page Start: e90
• Publication Date: 2018-08
• Subjects: Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Electromyography -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.692
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1388-2457

Abstract

Abstract : Question: Changes in synaptic and neuronal efficacy such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) are thought to reflect synaptic processes underlying learning and memory. Homeostatic plasticity is considered to stabilize neural activity within a physiologically reasonable and dynamic range. Quadri-pulse-thetaburst stimulation (qTBS) is a recently introduced patterned transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol that induced lasting increase or decrease in neuronal excitability of human primary motor cortex (M1) probably corresponding to the model of LTP- and LTD-like plasticity. Here, we aimed to probe homeostatic and metaplastic interactions of an inhibitory priming qTBS protocol on subsequent facilitating and inhibitory qTBS. Methods: We investigated the priming mechanisms of inhibitory qTBS on subsequent facilitating qTBS (experiment 1) in 8 healthy volunteers and on subsequent inhibitory qTBS (experiment 2) in 9 healthy volunteers. Inhibitory qTBS consisted of 360 bursts given continuously to M1 (i.e. 1440 full-sine pulses) with bursts of four biphasic TMS pulses (duration 160 μ s) separated by inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) of 50 ms (20 Hz) and inter-burst intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz) (qTBS50/200). Facilitatory qTBS consisted of the same burst pattern but with ISI of 5 ms (200 Hz) (qTBS5/200). TMS was applied by a custom-made magnet stimulator (MSB, Munich). Resting motor threshold (RMT) and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes with stimulus intensities to target amplitudes of 1 mV were measured before priming qTBS50/200 (pre), directly after priming qTBS50/200 (post1), after 15 min (post2) and after 30 min (post3). Following post 3 measurements, the second stimulation (qTBS5/200 or qTBS50/200) was applied and the RMT and MEP were measured for 60 min (post4–post7). Results: In experiment 1 (qTBS50/200–qTBS5/200), priming with qTBS50/200 led to a decrease of MEP amplitudes (post1–3), while MEP amplitudes increased following subsequent qTBS5/200 (post 4–7). Mean changes of post 4–7 increased significantly as compared to mean changes of post 1–3. In experiment 2 (qTBS50/200–qTBS50/200), MEP amplitudes decreased following the priming protocol (post 1–3) and returned to baseline with a slight increase on post 6 after the subsequent qTBS50/200 protocol. Mean changes of post 4–7 increased significantly as compared to mean changes of post 1–3. Conclusion: Our preliminary results may point towards homeostatic mechanisms of facilitatory qTBS5/200 following priming with qTBS50/200. In contrast, subsequent qTBS50/200 led to a de-depression like effect of MEP amplitudes suggesting metaplastic effects of two inhibitory qTBS protocols applied over M1. Our findings may support the assumption that changes in cortico-spinal excitability following qTBS represent LTP- and LTD-like changes in synaptic transmission and corroborate metaplastic de-depression effects of high-frequency patterned rTMS protocols in human M1.