Political and government connections on corporate boards in Australia: Good for business?. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gray, Stephen; Harymawan, Iman; Nowland, John
• Is Part Of: Australian journal of management. Volume 41:Number 1(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 3
• Page End: 26
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Board of directors -- director appointments -- director experience -- government connections -- political connections; G34 -- G14 -- D72; Management -- Periodicals; Management -- Australia -- Periodicals; Business enterprises -- Finance -- Periodicals; Industrial management -- Australia -- Periodicals; 330
• DOI: 10.1177/0312896214535788
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0312-8962

Abstract

While prior studies document the benefits of political connections in emerging markets, their value in developed markets is less certain. In this study, we examine the types of firms that have directors with political and government connections on their boards and the value of these connections to shareholders in Australia, a developed market with low levels of corruption and lobbying, and public funding of election campaigns. We find that directors with political and government connections hold 2.1% of listed company directorships (in 7.7% of listed companies) in Australia. After controlling for director and firm characteristics, we find the market reaction to the appointment of directors with political and government connections is significantly lower than other directors. This is particularly the case for former politicians whose political parties are not in power and who have less political experience. In summary, we find no evidence that political and government connections on corporate boards are particularly abundant or valuable to shareholders in Australia.