Stochastic Post-Processing of CFSR Daily Precipitation across Canada. Issue 2 (15th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khedhaouiria, Dikra; Mailhot, Alain; Favre, Anne-Catherine
• Is Part Of: Atmosphere-ocean. Volume 56:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 104
• Page End: 116
• Publication Date: 2018-03-15
• Subjects: reanalysis -- daily precipitation -- precipitation modelling -- stochastic post-processing; Ocean-atmosphere interaction -- Canada -- Periodicals; Ocean-atmosphere interaction -- Periodicals; Oceanography -- Canada -- Periodicals; Oceanography -- Periodicals; Meteorology -- Canada -- Periodicals; Meteorology -- Periodicals; 551.5246
• DOI: 10.1080/07055900.2018.1434122
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0705-5900

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Reanalyses, based on numerical weather prediction methods assimilating past observations, provide continuous precipitation datasets and represent interesting options for assessing the climatology of regions with sparse station networks (e.g., northern Canada). However, reanalysis series cannot be used directly because of possible biases and mismatch between their spatial and temporal resolutions with that needed for local applications. To address these issues, a Stochastic Model Output Statistics (SMOS) approach was selected to post-process precipitation series simulated by the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) across Canada. This approach uses CFSR precipitation as a covariate and is based on two regression models: the first one is a logistic regression that deals with precipitation occurrence, and the second is a vector generalized linear model for precipitation intensity. At-site post-processed daily precipitation series are randomly generated using the SMOS approach, and selected climate indicators from the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices, which is jointly sponsored by the Commission for Climatology of the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) World Climate Data and Monitoring Programme, the Climate Variability and Predictability Programme of the World Climate Research Programme, and the Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (CCI/CLIVAR/JCOMM) are estimated and compared with corresponding observed and CFSR values. The two models in the SMOS approach, in addition to adequately correcting systematic biases, produced better predictions than the climatology of the wet and dry and intensity sequences. Additionally, the SMOS generally yields consistent climate indices when compared with those from CFSR without post-processing, though there is still room for improvement for specific indices (e.g., annual maximum of cumulative wet days).