Cooperative nest‐defence behaviour and territory quality in a resident and socially monogamous passerine. (5th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Naďo, Ladislav; Kašová, Martina; Krištín, Anton; Kaňuch, Peter
• Editors: Wright, J.
• Is Part Of: Ethology. Volume 124:Number 7(2018)
• Page Start: 514
• Page End: 526
• Publication Date: 2018-06-05
• Subjects: cooperation -- deimatic behaviour -- fidelity -- hole‐nesting birds -- sex roles -- territoriality; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1111/eth.12755
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0179-1613

Abstract

Abstract: Nest defence is a fundamental aspect of parental care in secondary cavity‐nesting birds, and predation or competition for nesting sites can involve different defensive behaviours. Because habitat quality determines breeding success, we were interested in whether breeding pairs of the Eurasian nuthatch, Sitta europaea, established in more favourable environment also manifest higher probability of cooperative behaviour during their nest‐site defence. To explore this relationship, we quantified behavioural displays of both parents and analysed activity budget ethogram data from simulated territorial intrusions performed in the chick‐feeding phase with one conspecific and two different heterospecific stimuli (dummies of nuthatch, starling and woodpecker). We found that paired individuals shared their roles during nest‐site defence to a considerable extent. Males had a significantly higher number of attacks on intruders than females, and females performed more threat displays and controls of the brood than males. Multinomial analysis of the cooperative behaviour suggested that pairs in a high‐quality territory had higher probability of reciprocal substitution of different roles towards a balance between attacks, threat displays and nest controls. Contrary to this, pairs in a low‐quality territory had less likely pairwise combinations of simultaneous behavioural states that are associated with effective nest‐site defence. The difference in response probability according to territory quality was, however, highly variable in view of the stimulus that was used in simulated territorial intrusion. Because individual roles and the complex behavioural repertoire of pairs altered in response to territory quality and potential nest‐site competitor or brood predator, our results suggest that the cooperative nest‐defence behaviour could be linked to the breeding success of this year‐round territorial species living in a heterogeneous forest habitat.