Grouping methods for estimating the prevalences of rare traits from complex survey data that preserve confidentiality of respondents. (26th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hyun, Noorie; Gastwirth, Joseph L.; Graubard, Barry I.
• Is Part Of: Statistics in medicine. Volume 37:Number 13(2018)
• Page Start: 2174
• Page End: 2186
• Publication Date: 2018-03-26
• Subjects: categorical outcome -- group testing -- NHANES -- probability sample -- sensitivity and specificity; Medical statistics -- Periodicals; Statistique médicale -- Périodiques; Statistiques médicales -- Périodiques; 610.727
• DOI: 10.1002/sim.7648
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-6715

Abstract

Abstract : Originally, 2‐stage group testing was developed for efficiently screening individuals for a disease. In response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, 1‐stage group testing was adopted for estimating prevalences of a single or multiple traits from testing groups of size q, so individuals were not tested. This paper extends the methodology of 1‐stage group testing to surveys with sample weighted complex multistage‐cluster designs. Sample weighted‐generalized estimating equations are used to estimate the prevalences of categorical traits while accounting for the error rates inherent in the tests. Two difficulties arise when using group testing in complex samples: (1) How does one weight the results of the test on each group as the sample weights will differ among observations in the same group. Furthermore, if the sample weights are related to positivity of the diagnostic test, then group‐level weighting is needed to reduce bias in the prevalence estimation; (2) How does one form groups that will allow accurate estimation of the standard errors of prevalence estimates under multistage‐cluster sampling allowing for intracluster correlation of the test results. We study 5 different grouping methods to address the weighting and cluster sampling aspects of complex designed samples. Finite sample properties of the estimators of prevalences, variances, and confidence interval coverage for these grouping methods are studied using simulations. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data are used to illustrate the methods.