Disparities in herpes simplex virus type 2 infection between black and white men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA. (September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Okafor, Netochukwu; Rosenberg, Eli S; Luisi, Nicole; Sanchez, Travis; Rio, Carlos del; Sullivan, Patrick S; Kelley, Colleen F
• Is Part Of: International journal of STD & AIDS. Volume 26:Number 10(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 740
• Page End: 745
• Publication Date: 2015-09
• Subjects: Sexually transmitted infections -- herpes simplex virus type 2 -- HSV2 -- seroprevalence -- men who have sex with men -- HIV -- AIDS -- disparities -- USA; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; 616.951
• DOI: 10.1177/0956462414552814
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-4624

Abstract

HIV disproportionately affects black men who have sex with men, and herpes simplex virus type 2 is known to increase acquisition of HIV. However, data on racial disparities in herpes simplex virus type 2 prevalence and risk factors are limited among men who have sex with men in the United States. InvolveMENt was a cohort study of black and white HIV-negative men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA. Univariate and multivariate cross-sectional associations with herpes simplex virus type 2 seroprevalence were assessed among 455 HIV-negative men who have sex with men for demographic, behavioural and social determinant risk factors using logistic regression. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 was 23% (48/211) for black and 16% (38/244) for white men who have sex with men ( p = 0.05). Education, poverty, drug/alcohol use, incarceration, circumcision, unprotected anal intercourse, and condom use were not associated with herpes simplex virus type 2. In multivariate analyses, black race for those ≤25 years, but not >25 years, and number of sexual partners were significantly associated. Young black men who have sex with men are disproportionately affected by herpes simplex virus type 2, which may contribute to disparities in HIV acquisition. An extensive assessment of risk factors did not explain this disparity in herpes simplex virus type 2 infection suggesting differences in susceptibility or partner characteristics.