Content analysis to classify and compare Live, Virtual, Constructive simulations and System of Systems. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Diallo, Saikou Y; Padilla, Jose J; Papelis, Yiannis; Gore, Ross; Lynch, Christopher J
• Is Part Of: Journal of defense modeling and simulation. Volume 13:Number 4(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 367
• Page End: 380
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: content analysis -- Live -- Virtual -- Constructive (LVC) simulation -- System of Systems (SoS) -- systems engineering; Military art and science -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; 355.0011305
• DOI: 10.1177/1548512915621972
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1548-5129

Abstract

In this paper, we examine to what extent Live, Virtual, Constructive (LVC) simulations can be used to model and simulate a System of Systems (SoS) by (1) establishing LVC and SoS domain profiles based on concepts discussed in each community and (2) finding overlapping concepts. To do so, we apply content analysis to the Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) conference papers to identify the driving concepts and relationships that are most associated with LVC systems. Similarly, we apply content analysis to the IEEE/Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SOSE). We use the Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization dataset to train a learner about LVC and automatically discover the LVC concepts and relationships within the SoS literature. Similarly, we use the SoS Engineering dataset to train a learner about SoS and use it to discover the concepts and relationships of SoS in the LVC literature. We show the two domains present some overlap on the technical side. However, LVC does not consider what the SoS literature considers crucial: the human/social component. This omission, or assumption, suggests that (1), although the SoS body of knowledge has some theoretical work, there is not enough work that transitions theory to practice and (2) LVC does not implement full SoS concepts but reflects traditional system approaches.