Decisions on nuclear decommissioning strategies: Historical review. (July 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Decisions on nuclear decommissioning strategies: Historical review. (July 2018)
- Main Title:
- Decisions on nuclear decommissioning strategies: Historical review
- Authors:
- Suh, Young A
Hornibrook, Carol
Yim, Man-Sung - Abstract:
- Abstract: Nuclear decommissioning is the final technical and administrative process in the life cycle of nuclear power operation. As such, decommissioning must strive to ensure public safety. This goal requires many factors be involved in the decision making process. The purpose of this research is to examine how experienced countries have taken into account a variety of associated factors when deciding on a nuclear decommissioning strategy. The information consisted of 162 historical cases, where the reactor was permanently shutdown. Major factors affecting those decisions were identified and quantified; each were subsequently evaluated through logistic regression and the Spearman's correlation analysis. The factors used in the study were operating periods, Health Development Index (HDI), decommissioning funding, public acceptance, public tolerance, decommissioning experience level, the reactor type, operating history, availability of radioactive waste facilities, presence of multiple units at the site, and technological capabilities. These statistical analyses identified key factors significantly influencing nuclear decommissioning strategy decisions. These decisions were on how to perform the decommissioning work i.e., DECON (immediate dismantling) vs. SAFESTOR (deferred dismantling) and on site end-state, i.e., greenfield vs. brownfield. Studying the roles of these factors in their respective decisions provided a number of related insights. Although historical data usedAbstract: Nuclear decommissioning is the final technical and administrative process in the life cycle of nuclear power operation. As such, decommissioning must strive to ensure public safety. This goal requires many factors be involved in the decision making process. The purpose of this research is to examine how experienced countries have taken into account a variety of associated factors when deciding on a nuclear decommissioning strategy. The information consisted of 162 historical cases, where the reactor was permanently shutdown. Major factors affecting those decisions were identified and quantified; each were subsequently evaluated through logistic regression and the Spearman's correlation analysis. The factors used in the study were operating periods, Health Development Index (HDI), decommissioning funding, public acceptance, public tolerance, decommissioning experience level, the reactor type, operating history, availability of radioactive waste facilities, presence of multiple units at the site, and technological capabilities. These statistical analyses identified key factors significantly influencing nuclear decommissioning strategy decisions. These decisions were on how to perform the decommissioning work i.e., DECON (immediate dismantling) vs. SAFESTOR (deferred dismantling) and on site end-state, i.e., greenfield vs. brownfield. Studying the roles of these factors in their respective decisions provided a number of related insights. Although historical data used in this study may not be sufficient to reveal nation specific issues or detailed interactions among the factors analyzed, the observations from this study will be useful for future efforts in nuclear decommissioning, especially for countries without any experience in decommissioning. Highlights: Identification of major factors affecting nuclear decommissioning strategy decision. Statistical analyses for quantitatively validating the influence of key factors on nuclear decommissioning strategy decision. Reviews 162 historical cases where the reactor was permanently shutdown. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Progress in nuclear energy. Volume 106(2018)
- Journal:
- Progress in nuclear energy
- Issue:
- Volume 106(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 106, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 106
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0106-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 34
- Page End:
- 43
- Publication Date:
- 2018-07
- Subjects:
- Nuclear decommissioning strategies -- Historical decommissioning cases and experiences -- Major factors affecting decisions
Nuclear energy -- Periodicals
Nuclear engineering -- Periodicals
333.7924 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01491970 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.02.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0149-1970
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6870.542000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6714.xml