MONSTERS, ALIENS, AND THE END OF THE WORLD. Issue 3 (4th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barnier, Brian
• Is Part Of: EDPACS. Volume 57:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 14
• Publication Date: 2018-03-04
• Subjects: Electronic data processing -- Auditing -- Periodicals; Computers -- Access control -- Periodicals; Electronic data processing departments -- Security measures -- Periodicals; 005.8
• DOI: 10.1080/07366981.2018.1436809
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0736-6981

Abstract

Abstract: Consistent flaws are revealed in post-incident reviews of security failures and ongoing reviews of security processes. These flaws include the math and methods used, insufficient situational awareness, overlooked systems mechanics, and missed root causes. Yet, many security teams are composed of bright, diligent, and dedicated professionals. How could they make such big mistakes? Simple—by being vulnerable to their own brains. It's about brain science. Cognitive bias and structural blindness is the human condition. Brains must be trained to overcome our own vulnerabilities—like a martial artist building speed. This training is entirely different from checklists, intrusion prevention systems or mandatory security awareness videos. Yes, errors in typical security methods have wasted untold hours of human labor and mountains of money. Good news is that we security pros are not alone. Professionals in other areas have been exploring ways to help our brains see bigger and better for decades. Our opportunity is to bring this into security. Decades of research and proven practice are adapted to tech-related risk in a "dual cycle" approach. The first cycle—the "5 + 2 Step Cycle for Managing Risk to Performance"—is about substantive improvements in the management of risk. The second cycle is about "making change stick" by integrating the substantive change with an organizational change/transformation method.