Analysis and comparison of focused ion beam milling and vibratory polishing sample surface preparation methods for porosity study of U-Mo plate fuel for research and test reactors. (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Westman, Bjorn; Miller, Brandon; Jue, Jan-Fong; Aitkaliyeva, Assel; Keiser, Dennis; Madden, James; Tucker, Julie D.
• Is Part Of: Micron. Volume 110(2018)
• Page Start: 57
• Page End: 66
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: Porosity -- Image analysis -- MatLab -- Focused ion beam -- Vibratory -- Uranium -- Molybdenum -- Fuel -- Research reactor -- Sample preparation; Microscopy -- Periodicals; Electron Probe Microanalysis -- Periodicals; Microscopy -- Periodicals; Microscopie -- Périodiques; Microscopy; Periodicals; 502.82
• DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2018.04.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0968-4328

Abstract

Highlights: Surface damage caused by FIB milling makes accurate image segmentation difficult. Vibratory polishing produces larger, less damaged, surfaces than FIB milling. Vibratory polishing is removing extra material surrounding pores. Vibratory polishing methods require improvement before full implementation. Abstract: Uranium-Molybdenum (U-Mo) low enriched uranium (LEU) fuels are a promising candidate for the replacement of high enriched uranium (HEU) fuels currently in use in a high power research and test reactors around the world. Contemporary U-Mo fuel sample preparation uses focused ion beam (FIB) methods for analysis of fission gas porosity. However, FIB possess several drawbacks, including reduced area of analysis, curtaining effects, and increased FIB operation time and cost. Vibratory polishing is a well understood method for preparing large sample surfaces with very high surface quality. In this research, fission gas porosity image analysis results are compared between samples prepared using vibratory polishing and FIB milling to assess the effectiveness of vibratory polishing for irradiated fuel sample preparation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed on sections of irradiated U-Mo fuel plates and the micrographs were analyzed using a fission gas pore identification and measurement script written in MatLab. Results showed that the vibratory polishing method is preferentially removing material around the edges of the pores, causing the pores to become larger and more rounded, leading to overestimation of the fission gas porosity size. Whereas, FIB preparation tends to underestimate due to poor micrograph quality and surface damage leading to inaccurate segmentations. Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, vibratory polishing remains a valid method for porosity analysis sample preparation, however, improvements should be made to reduce the preferential removal of material surrounding pores in order to minimize the error in the porosity measurements.