Marital status and survival in patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. (June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Xiangyang; Cao, Weilan; Zheng, Chenguo; Hu, Wanle; Liu, Changbao
• Is Part Of: Cancer epidemiology. Volume 54(2018:Jun.)
• Page Start: 119
• Page End: 124
• Publication Date: 2018-06
• Subjects: CRC colorectal cancer -- RC rectal cancer -- SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results -- ICD-O-3 International Classification of Diseases for Oncology 3rd edition -- AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer -- TNM tumor, node, and metastasis -- HR hazard ratio -- CCS cause-specific survival -- CI confidence interval; Rectal neoplasms -- Marital status -- Cancer survival -- SEER; Cancer -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Carcinogenesis -- Periodicals; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.04.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1877-7821

Abstract

Highlights: Marital status is an independent prognostic factor for survival in rectal cancer (RC). We extracted and analyzed rectal cancer patient data from the SEER database. Married patients were more likely to receive surgery compared to the widowed, never married and divorced/separated patients. In patients with stage I-IV RC, widowed patients are at higher risk of cancer specific mortality. Abstract: Background: Marital status has been validated as an independent prognostic factor for survival in several cancer types, but is controversial in rectal cancer (RC). The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of marital status on the survival outcomes of patients with RC. Methods: We extracted data of 27, 498 eligible patients diagnosed with RC between 2004 and 2009 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were categorized into married, never married, divorced/separated and widowed groups.We used Chi-square tests to compare characteristics of patients with different marital status.Rectal cancer specific survival was compared using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariate Cox regression analyses was used to analyze the survival outcome risk factors in different marital status. Results: The widowed group had the highest percentage of elderly patients and women, higher proportion of adenocarcinomas, and more stage I/II in tumor stage (P < 0.05), but with a lower rate of surgery compared to the married group (76.7% VS 85.4%). Compared with the married patients, the never married (HR 1.40), widowed (HR 1.61, ) and divorced/separated patients (HR 1.16) had an increased overall 5-year mortality. A further analysis showed that widowed patients had an increased overall 5-year cause-specific survival(CSS) compared with married patients at stage I(HR 1.92), stage II (HR 1.65), stage III (HR 1.73), and stage IV (HR 1.38). Conclusion: Our study showed marriage was associated with better outcomes of RC patients, but unmarried RC patients, especially widowed patients, are at greater risk of cancer specific mortality.