Platelet-Rich Plasma for Arthroscopic Repair of Medium to Large Rotator Cuff Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jo, Chris Hyunchul; Shin, Ji Sun; Shin, Won Hyoung; Lee, Seung Yeon; Yoon, Kang Sup; Shin, Sue
• Is Part Of: American journal of sports medicine. Volume 43:Number 9(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 2102
• Page End: 2110
• Publication Date: 2015-09
• Subjects: platelet-rich plasma -- medium to large rotator cuff tear -- rotator cuff repair -- biological augmentation -- retear -- integrity; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546515587081
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-5465

Abstract

Background: Two main questions about the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for regeneration purposes are its effect on the speed of healing and the quality of healing. Despite recent numerous studies, evidence is still lacking in this area, especially in a representative patient population with medium to large rotator cuff tears. Purpose: To assess the efficacy of PRP augmentation on the speed and quality of healing in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for medium to large rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 74 patients scheduled for arthroscopic repair of medium to large rotator cuff tears were randomly assigned to undergo either PRP-augmented repair (PRP group) or conventional repair (conventional group). In the PRP group, 3 PRP gels (3 × 3 mL) were applied to each patient between the torn end and the greater tuberosity. The primary outcome was the Constant score at 3 months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, overall satisfaction and function, functional scores, retear rate, and change in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the supraspinatus muscle. Results: There was no difference between the 2 groups in the Constant score at 3 months ( P > .05). The 2 groups had similar results on the VAS for pain, ROM, muscle strength, overall satisfaction and function, and other functional scores (all P > .05) except for the VAS for worst pain ( P = .043). The retear rate of the PRP group (3.0%) was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (20.0%) ( P = .032). The change in 1-year postoperative and immediately postoperative CSAs was significantly different between the 2 groups: –36.76 ± 45.31 mm 2 in the PRP group versus −67.47 ± 47.26 mm 2 in the conventional group ( P = .014). Conclusion: Compared with repairs without PRP augmentation, the current PRP preparation and application methods for medium to large rotator cuff repairs significantly improved the quality, as evidenced by a decreased retear rate and increased CSA of the supraspinatus, but not the speed of healing. However, further studies may be needed to investigate the effects of PRP on the speed of healing without risking the quality.